Theorist's Mother

Andrew Parker is Professor of English at Amherst College. He is the editor and co-translator of Jacques Ranciere’s The Philosopher and His Poor and a co-editor of After Sex? On Writing since Queer Theory, both also published by Duke University Press.

• Preface and Acknowledgments xiIntroduction: Philosophy's Mother Trouble 11. Mom, Encore: Rereading, Teaching, and "Maternal Divination" 29Beware the Crocodile! 29"Mom" 34Lacan's Two Bodies 40Do Not Read 45"Maternal Divination" 542. History, Fiction, and "The Author of Waverley; or, Fathers and Sons in Marxist Criticism 57Family Romances 57The Prehistory of the Present 59The History of the Father 68Fictions: Of Paternity 74"The Author of Waverley 803. Translating Revolution: Freud, Marx, and the Mameloshn 88The Mother of Language 88The Translator's Hand(s) 91Philosophies of Translation 95Forgetting the Mother Tongue 99The Mameloshn 103Coda: Other Maternities 111Notes 117Bibliography 149Index 173

“I found Parker’s readings of Marx and Freud enjoyable and pleasingly intricate. . . . [T]his book is stimulating and provocative, and is well worth reading for all those interested in the relation between philosophy and maternity.” - Alison Stone, Hypatia“In the last chapter of The Theorist’s Mother, "Translating Revolution: Freud, Marx, and the Mameloshn," all of the threads of Andy’s book come together in a breathtakingly original reading…. [His] book is committed to asking a set of probing questions about how mothers disturb the very possibility of establishing any clear philosophical or critical distinctions at all.” - Elissa Marder, Los Angeles Review of Books "Andrew Parker is one of the major literary theorists and critics of his generation, and The Theorist's Mother is a tremendous accomplishment, a keen and unprecedented argument about how the maternal appears, or fails to appear, within the archives of theory. In his extraordinarily careful readings of Lacan, LukÁcs, Marx, and Freud, Parker's point is not to reiterate that the maternal is repressed, foreclosed, or displaced, but to show how this structural loss comes to form and disturb the theory. His book is a tour de force, a rich, erudite, and original work by a rare and capacious intellectual."-Judith Butler, Maxine Elliot Professor, University of California, Berkeley "Andrew Parker leads us from Derrida imagining his granddaughter as that philosopher he'd like to have had as his mother to Barthes becoming his mother's mother. Along the way, we revisit the hated mothers of Nietzsche and Marx, the psychosomatic body of Parker's own mother, Pontalis's droll image of the mother we spend a lifetime trying to change because we cannot change our mothers, and the originally ersatz mother. The mother becomes a figure of impossible origin: lacking original meaning, plural, split. As we move from the problem of reproducibility in Marxism and psychoanalysis, through translatability and the problematics of the mother tongue, ending with the pregnancy of Thomas Beatie, the figure of the literal mother has long since collapsed, the mother has never been natural, teleological, or original-the mother we meet with Andrew Parker is queered and invigoratingly plastic."-Penelope Deutscher, author of The Philosophy of Simone de Beauvoir: Ambiguity, Conversion, Resistance "This fascinating and beautifully written book does for maternity what a good deal of theory, starting with Freud, has done for paternity. Andrew Parker shows that many members of the 'male theory canon' have developed strategies to make the mother disappear. He investigates the role of mothers in philosophers' lives and the treatment of mothers in their thought, shrewdly circling around issues of the maternal, the relation of biographical experience to theoretical articulation, and the nature and functioning of authority."-Jonathan Culler, author of The Literary in Theory “In the last chapter of The Theorist’s Mother, "Translating Revolution: Freud, Marx, and the Mameloshn," all of the threads of Andy’s book come together in a breathtakingly original reading…. [His] book is committed to asking a set of probing questions about how mothers disturb the very possibility of establishing any clear philosophical or critical distinctions at all.” (Los Angeles Review of Books)