Del 0 - Cambridge Studies in Philosophy

The Grammar of Meaning

Normativity and Semantic Discourse

Inbunden, Engelska, 1997

AvMark Norris Lance,John O'Leary-Hawthorne,Lance Mark Norris,O'Leary-Hawthorne John

1 989 kr

Beställningsvara. Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar. Fri frakt för medlemmar vid köp för minst 249 kr.

Finns i fler format (1)

Häftad

889 kr

Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar

What is the function of concepts pertaining to meaning in socio-linguistic practice? In this study, the authors argue that we can approach a satisfactory answer by displacing the standard picture of meaning talk as a sort of description with a picture that takes seriously the similarity between meaning talk and various types of normative injunction. In their discussion of this approach, they investigate the more general question of the nature of the normative, as well as a range of important topics specific to the philosophy of language.

Produktinformation

Utgivningsdatum1997-12-11
Mått145 x 224 x 30 mm
Vikt650 g
FormatInbunden
SpråkEngelska
SerieCambridge Studies in Philosophy
Antal sidor468
FörlagCambridge University Press
ISBN9780521583008

Tillhör följande kategorier

Introduction; 1. The ends and means of translation: critical reflections on Quine's indeterminacy of translation thesis; 2. Synonymy, analyticity and a priori authority; 3. Where do we go from here? A pragmatist account of normative judgement; 4. The epistemology of meaning and the analysis of meaning; 5. Robust meaning theories and canonical dispositionalism; 6. Reduction and naturalism; 7. Realism and factuality.

Review of the hardback: 'Lance and O'Leary-Hawthorne have a completely novel interpretation of and approach to the claim that the concept of meaning is a normative one. Meaning talk is not talk about something that is already there - not even linguistic norms that are already there. It is rather an attempt to bring something into existence - to 'establish' norms that will make possible mutual understanding and practical cooperation. This excellent study makes a signal contribution to our understanding of one of the most central and controversial topics in the philosophy of language.' Bob Brandom, University of Pittsburgh