Protecting the Fatherland: Lawsuits and Political Debates in Jülich, Hesse-Cassel and Brittany (1642-1655)

Inbunden, Engelska, 2021

Av Christel Annemieke Romein

639 kr

Beställningsvara. Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar

Fri frakt för medlemmar vid köp för minst 249 kr.

Finns i fler format (1)

Häftad

519 kr

Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar

Further, it rejects the notion of deliberate state-building and demonstrates that the nobility used this terminology to object to princely politics as part of adopting a “presupposed office.” This status allowed the nobility to place itself outside the ruler-subject constellation and critique the situation.

Produktinformation

Utgivningsdatum2021-10-09
Mått155 x 235 x 19 mm
Vikt535 g
FormatInbunden
SpråkEngelska
SerieStudies in the History of Law and Justice
Antal sidor218
FörlagSpringer Nature Switzerland AG
ISBN9783030742393

Tillhör följande kategorier

Rättshistoria inom Juridik
Juridik: metod och teori inom Juridik

Annemieke Romein obtained her PhD at Erasmus University in 2016 on a comparative study of the political terminology of the fatherland, patria and patriot in Hessen-Kassel, Gulik and Bretagne. In 2017 she received an NWO Rubicon grant with which she worked in Ghent from September 2017 to February 2020 on a project on political-institutional/legal history, a comparison between the regions of Flanders and Holland between 1576-1702. She was a Researcher-in-Residence/ project leader of the Digital Humanities “Entangled Histories” project at the KB National Library of the Netherlands. Since 2020 she is working at Huygens ING where she continues her research into early modern provincial regulations with her NWO Veni project ‘A Game of Thrones?’.

Introduction.- Part I. Holy Roman Empire.- Political language in the Holy Roman Empire 1500-1700.- Jülich: pamphlets and Cologne get-togethers (1640s-1650s).- Hesse-Cassel: alleged sedition and law-suits (1640s-1650s).- Part II. Kingdom of France.- Patriots’ in France, political talks between 1500-1700.- Brittany: pay d’états and don gratuit (1648-1652).- Part III. Conclusion.- Comparison of the cases.