Models and Frameworks for Implementing Evidence-Based Practice

Jo Rycroft-Malone is Professor of Health Services & Implementation Research at Bangor University and Editor, Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing. Tracey Bucknall is Professor of Nursing, at Deakin University and Cabrini Health and Associate Editor, Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing.

• Notes on Contributors ixForeword by Huw Davis xivPreface xvii1 Evidence-based practice: doing the right thing for patients 1Tracey Bucknall and Jo Rycroft-MaloneIntroduction 1What is evidence-based practice? 2What does implementation of evidence into practice mean? 5Attributes infl uencing successful implementation 9Why this book? 14References 182 Theory, frameworks, and models: laying down the groundwork 23Jo Rycroft-Malone and Tracey BucknallIntroduction 23Theory informed evidence-based practice 23Using theory and frameworks for implementing evidence-based practice 30Models and frameworks 39Models and frameworks included in this book 44Summary 47References 473 Stetler model 51Cheryl B. StetlerIntroduction and purpose of the model 51Background and context 56Intended audience and actual users of the model 61Hypotheses and propositions 64Use and related evaluation of the Stetler model 64Perceived strengths and weaknesses of the model 72Information on barriers and facilitators to implementing the model 74The future 76Summary 76References 774 The Ottawa Model of Research Use 83Jo Logan and Ian D. GrahamPurpose and assumptions 84Background and context 84Intended audience/users 97Hypotheses and research possibilities 97Critique (strengths and limitations of OMRU) 98Future possibilities 100Conclusion 101Summary: How the model can be used/applied 101References 1025 Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS) 109Jo Rycroft-MaloneBackground 110Purpose and assumptions 110Background to PARIHS’ development 111Intended users 120Hypotheses and propositions 126Others’ use of PARIHS 127Critique (strengths and weaknesses) of PARIHS 130Future plans 131Conclusion 132Summary: How PARIHS could be used 132References 1336 Iowa model of evidence-based practice 137Marita TitlerOverview and purpose 137Development of the model 140Intended users 141Hypothesis generation 142Critique (strengths and weaknesses) of the Iowa model 143Barriers and facilitators to model implementation 143Future plans for model revisions 144Summary: How the model can be used/applied 144References 1447 Dissemination and use of research evidence for policy and practice: a framework for developing, implementing, and evaluating strategies 147Maureen Dobbins, Kara DeCorby and Paula RobesonIntroduction 148Purpose of the framework 149Model development 150Intended audience 154Hypothesis generation 155Examples of framework’s use 157Perceived strengths and weaknesses 159Future plans for framework modifications 161Summary: How the model can be used/applied 161References 1638 ARCC (Advancing Research and Clinical practice through close Collaboration): a model for system-wide implementation and sustainability of evidence-based practice 169Bernadette Mazurek Melnyk and Ellen Fineout-OverholtPurpose of and assumptions in the ARCC model 170Background to the ARCC model 171Intended users 177Hypotheses generated from the ARCC model 177Use and implementation of the ARCC model and implications for future research 179Critique (strengths and weaknesses) of the ARCC model 181Summary: How the model can be used/applied 182References 1829 The Joanna Briggs Institute model of evidence-based health care as a framework for implementing evidence 185Alan PearsonPurpose and assumptions 186Background to the JBI model’s development 186Intended users of the model 192Hypotheses and propositions 193Others’ use of the JBI model for implementing evidence 198Critique (strengths and weaknesses) of the JBI model for implementing evidence 200Future plans 201Summary: How the model can be used/applied 202References 20310 The Knowledge To Action framework 207Ian D Graham and Jacqueline M TetroePurpose of the framework 208Background and context 210Framework description 212Intended audiences/users 215Hypotheses and research possibilities – Has the framework generated hypotheses or propositions that the developers and others can and/or have been testing? 215Evaluation and use of the KTA framework 216Strengths and limitations 217Future plans for the development of the framework 218Summary: How the model can be used/applied 218References 21911 Analysis and synthesis of models and frameworks 223Jo Rycroft-Malone and Tracey BucknallBackground 223Synthesis 226Conclusion 244References 24412 Summary and concluding comments 247Jo Rycroft-Malone and Tracey BucknallA note about implementation 247A note about impact 250Applying models and frameworks to guide implementation 251Concluding remarks 255References 257Appendix 259Index 261

Select Guide Rating