Making of the Modern Child

Children's Literature in the Late Eighteenth Century

Inbunden, Engelska, 2003

AvAndrew O'Malley,Canada) O'Malley, Andrew (Ryerson University

3 069 kr

Beställningsvara. Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar. Fri frakt för medlemmar vid köp för minst 249 kr.

Finns i fler format (1)

Häftad

1 199 kr

Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar

This book explores how the concept of childhood in the late-18th century was constructed through the ideological work performed by children's literature, as well as pedagogical writing and medical literature of the era. Andrew O'Malley ties the evolution of the idea of "the child" to the growth of the middle class, which used the figure of the child as a symbol in its various calls for social reform.

Produktinformation

Utgivningsdatum2003-06-12
Mått152 x 229 x undefined mm
Vikt420 g
FormatInbunden
SpråkEngelska
SerieChildren's Literature and Culture
Antal sidor202
FörlagTaylor & Francis Ltd
ISBN9780415942997

Tillhör följande kategorier

Introduction: The English Middle Classes of the Late Eighteenth Century and the Impetus for Pedagogical Reform 1. The Coach and Six: Chapbook Residue in Late Eighteenth-Century Children's Literature 2. Class Relations in Middle-Class Children's Literature: Interacting with and Representing the Poor and the Rich 3. The Medical Management of the Late Eighteenth-Century Child 4. Towards the Self-Regulating Subject: Teaching Discipline in Pedagogical Systems and Children's Books 5. Molding the Middle-Class Subject of the Future: Applied Lessons and the Construction of Gender Roles Conclusion: he Trajectory of Children's Literature into the Early Nineteenth Century: Moving Towards a Middle-Class Form of Fantasy Notes Works Cited

'I would certainly recommend this work to anyone interested in the history of childhood and its literatures. The scholarship is exemplary, and I was constantly discovering things that I should have known but did not. The theory is sound and not so obtrusive as to detract from the analysis it supports, and what the arguement lacks in scope it makes up for in detail.'- John Morgenstern, Mount Saint Vincent University