Darwinism, Democracy, and Race

John P. Jackson is a Lecturer in Interdisciplinary Studies, Charles Center for Academic Excellence, College of William and Mary, USA David J. Depew is Emeritus Professor of Communication Studies and POROI (Project on the Rhetoric of Inquiry) at the University of Iowa, USA

• Introduction: In the Footsteps of Franz BoasChapter II: Franz Boas and the Argument From PresumptionChapter III: Demarcating Anthropology: The Boundary Work of Alfred KroeberChapter IV: Theodosius Dobzhansky and the Argument from DefinitionChapter V: Theodosius Dobzhansky and the Argument from DefinitionChapter VI: A Kairos Moment Unmet and Met: The Controversy Over Carlton Coon’s The Origin of RacesEpilogue: The Roots of the Sociobiology Controversy, the Infirmities of Evolutionary Psychology, and the Unity of Anthropology

Around the mid of the last century, evolutionary biology changed to become compatible with and even enable liberal-democratic and antiracist values. In their important book, Jackson and Depew recount the story of this crucial alliance. At a time of profound changes in both the political arena and the biological understanding of gene functioning and heredity, this alliance may look, in retrospect, more fragile and unstable than what we used to believe. Knowing deeply its contingent making and deep entanglement with wider anthropological and socio-political debates remains an essential tool to understand our present.Maurizio Meloni, author of Political Biology: Science and Social Values in Human Heredity from Eugenics to Epigenetics, PalgraveScience historians have long tended to stop at Darwin, and are only now beginning to open up the last century of the science of human evolution to critical historical analysis. In this literate and accessible new book, Jackson and Depew lead us through a marvelously intricate and intertwined intellectual history involving cultural anthropology, biological anthropology, population genetics, evolutionary biology, and racial studies. They scrupulously analyze the work of scholars like Alfred Kroeber, Ashley Montagu, Sherwood Washburn, and Theodosius Dobzhansky, and challenge the facile alt-histories that circulate in contemporary evolutionary psychology. This is an important addition to the library of anyone seriously interested in how we think about human origins and diversity. Jonathan Marks, Professor of Anthropology at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte, USAJackson and Depew have produced an important work: a muscular refutation of scientific racism, grounded in science and deploying the tools of the historian. Through rich new readings of the work of five central geneticists and anthropologists, they show that inoculation with the Modern Synthesis of evolutionary biology immunized biological anthropology against racist genetic determinism, leading this group of scientists toward a more egalitarian human biology. Anyone sympathetic to the idea that racial superiority is "in the genes" needs to confront this book. And those of us who find ourselves repeatedly whacking the mole of racist science now have a solid new mallet.Nathaniel Comfort, Professor of the History of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, USAI would suggest this book as a must-read for anyone interested in the concepts of race and identity, and in the contemporary discussions of genomics and society.Kostas Kampourakis, 2018, Science & Education, Springer"...it is a must-read for every rhetorician of science, and it may well be the breakthrough volume our subdiscipline has long awaited. To have not read this book and to say anything of science, democracy, race, and human values in the twentieth and early twenty-first centuries or of the implications of Darwin and his successors for the liberal-democratic order is, henceforth, to be unacceptably uninformed."John Angus Campbell, University of Memphis, USA