Wrongly Convicted

SAUNDRA D. WESTERVELT is an assistant professor of sociology at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro and is author of Shifting the Blame: How Victimization Became a Criminal Defense (Rutgers University Press). JOHN A. HUMPHREY is a professor of sociology at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro and coauthor of Deviant Behavior and The Administration of Justice.

• ContentsForeword ixAcknowledgements xiiiIntroduction 1Part I: Causes of Wrongful Conditions1 Misinformation and Wrongful Convictions 172 False Confessions 363 From the Jailhouse to the Courthouse 554 The Police Role in Wrongful Convictions 77Part II: The Social Characteristics of the Wrongly Convicted5 Who Are the Wrongly Convicted on Death Row? 996 Racial Bias and the Conviction of the InnocentPart III: The Faces of the Wrongly Convicted7 More Than a Reasonable Doubt 1358 No Appeal from the Grave 1549 Whodunit? An Examination of the Production of Wrongful Convictions 174Part IV: Visions for Change in the Twenty-first Century10 Back from the Courthouse 19911 Effective Assistance of Counsel 22012 DNA and Innocence Scholarship 24113 The Adversary System and Historical Accuracy 25314 Erroneous Convictions and the Death Penalty 269About the editors and contributors 281Index 289

The contributors to this collection discuss the many ways in which innocent criminal defendants can be convicted in a system that places great emphasis on protecting them. Some involve culpability: brutal or racially biased police and other officials, treacherous informants, and incompetent attorneys. . . . Recommended for upper-division undergraduates, graduate students, and faculty. (Choice) An all-star set of contributors and clearly written essays make this a worthwhile addition to anti-death penalty literatures. Westervelt and Humphrey take a practical approach to the topic. Essays in Part 1 show that eyewitnesses are often wrong, police trick suspects into making confessions, informants lie to gain benefits, and police can be incompetent or venal. Part 2 argues that those who are unpopular, uneducated, or members of a racial minority invite harsher treatment by authorities. The next section offers case studies on convictions that were wrongly obtained. . . . This excellent introduction to a controversial topic is highly recommended. (Library Journal) A very powerful addition to the debate on capital punishment. - George Kelling (author of Fixing Broken Windows)