What Do We Deserve?

A Reader on Justice and Desert

Häftad, Engelska, 1998

1 299 kr

Beställningsvara. Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar. Fri frakt för medlemmar vid köp för minst 249 kr.

Much of contemporary social and political theory has reduced the concept of desert to a minor role. The work of John Rawls is the prime example. Recently some philosophers have argued that the notion merits a more central place in social and political theory. This reader brings together opposing positions and arguments, thus stimulating debate over the meaning and significance of desert in contemporary thought. The book includes eight classical and twenty-two contemporary readings on the concept.

Produktinformation

Utgivningsdatum1998-11-19
Mått232 x 164 x 15 mm
Vikt517 g
FormatHäftad
SpråkEngelska
Antal sidor330
FörlagOUP USA
ISBN9780195122183

Tillhör följande kategorier

Preface I. Historical Interpretations of Desert Introduction: Louis P. Pojman 1: Plato: Justice as Harmony in the Soul and State 2: Aristotle: Justice as Equality According to Merit 3: Thomas Hobbes: Merit as Market Value 4: Adam Smith: Merit and Demerit 5: Immanuel Kant: Moral Worth as Alone Deserving Happiness 6: John Stuart Mill: Justice, Desert and Utility 7: Henry Sidwick: Justice as Desert 8: W.D. Ross: What Things Are Good? II. Contemporary Interpretations of Desert Introduction: Owen McLeod A. The Concept of Desert 9: Joel Feinberg, "Justice and Personal Desert" 10: John Kleining, "the Concept of Desert" 11: David Miller, "Deserts" 12: Julian Lamont, "The Concept of Desert in Distributive Justice" B. Desert and Responsibility 13: Galen Strawson, "The Impossibility of Moral Responsibility" 14: Harry Frankfurt, "Freedom of the Will and the Concept of Person" 15: David Miller, "Deserts" 16: Fred Feldman, "Desert" Reconsideration of Some Received Wisdom" C. The Rawlsian Debate 17: Herbert Spiegelberg, "The Argument for Equality from Compensatory Desert" 18: John Rawls, "A Theory of Justice" 19: Robert Nozick, "Anarchy, State and Utopia 20: Michael Sandel, "A Critique of Rawls' Theory of the Self and Desert" 21: Owen McLeod, "Desert and Institutions" 22: Samuel Scheffler, "Responsibility, Reactive Attitudesand Liberalism in Philosophy and Politics" D. The Role of Significance of Desert 23: Michael Slote, "Desert, Consent and Justice" 24: Norman Daniels, "Merit and Meritocracy" 25: Robert Goodin, "Negating Positive Desert Claims" 26: Robert Young, "Egalitarianism and the Modest Significance of Desert" 27: Fred Feldman, "Adjusting Utility for Justice" 28: Own McLeod, "Desert and Wages" 29: Louis Pojman, "Does Equality Trump Desert" 30: Shelly Kagan, "Equality and Desert" Bibliography

"An excellent anthology. Its selections will serve, I hope, to introduce students to the Rawlsian controversy once they have read Rawls, and to appreciate the role of desert more broadly. The readings seem nicely blended in degree of difficulty for students of varying backgrounds."--Louis Guenin, Harvard Medical School"Extremely well balanced and judicious choices. All major positions are well represented."--Allen Howard Podet, Buffalo State College"Very interesting approach to moral philosophy--almost a looking-glass approach to virtue ethics."--Manuel Davenport, Texas A&M University