Beställningsvara. Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar. Fri frakt för medlemmar vid köp för minst 249 kr.
Yet the legal concept of evidence is constantly changing, and the debate concerning the distinction between a legal concept of evidence, the ordinary concept of evidence and the concept of evidence in science is far from being settled.
Olivier Leclerc, Can there be a science of proof? A Cross-Atlantic dialogue (1898-1947).- Maciej Dybowski, A Good Enough (Meta) Theory of Evidence in Law. An Inferentialist Account.- Weronika Dzięgielewska, Why Are We Bound by Evidence? On The Normative Stance of Legal Proof.- Bohdan Pretkiel, Rethinking expert opinion evidence as an argument from epistemic authority.- Margarida Lacombe Camargo, Constitutional Evidence.- Giovanni Tuzet, Testimony and Hearsay.- Marcin Romanowicz, Neuroscientific Evidence in Courtroom: Clash of Two Anthropological Paradigms.- John R. Harris, An Epistemic Defense of Exclusionary Rules in the Criminal Justice System.- Adam Dyrda and Maciej Próchnicki, Expert’s (Meta)Testimony: An Epistemological Perspective.- Daniela Accatino, The Architecture of Evidential Justification between Atomism and Holism.
Maciej Dybowski, Weronika Dzięgielewska, Wojciech Rzepiński, Weronika Dziegielewska, Wojciech Rzepinski, Weronika Dzięgielewska, Weronika Dzi¿gielewska, Wojciech Rzepi¿ski