Federico Fabbrini is Full Professor of EU Law at Dublin City University, in Ireland and is the Founding Director of the Brexit Institute. He holds a PhD in Law from the European University Institute and previously had academic positions at Tilburg Law School, in the Netherlands, and iCourts (the Centre of Excellence for International Courts) at the University of Copenhagen, in Denmark. Federico Fabbrini is the author of 2 monographs with Oxford University Press, Economic Governance in Europe (2016) and Fundamental Rights in Europe (2014).

• Foreword Michel Barnier: 1: Federico Fabbrini: Introduction Part I: The Process 2: Emily Jones: The Negotiations 3: Federico Fabbrini & Rebecca Schmidt: The Extensions 4: Paul Craig: The Ratifications Part II: The Withdrawal Agreement: Substantive Aspects 5: Catherine Barnard & Emilija Leinarte: Citizens' Rights 6: Colin Harvey: The Irish Border 7: Michele Chang: The Financial Settlement Part III: The Withdrawal Agreement: Governance Aspects 8: Kenneth Armstrong: The Transition 9: Joris Larik: Decision-Making and Dispute Settlement 10: Giorgio Sacerdoti & Paola Mariani: The Future Negotiations Part IV: The Challenges 11: Sionaidh Douglas-Scott: The Future of the UK 12: Etain Tannam: The Future of UK-Irish Relations 13: Federico Fabbrini: The Future of the EU at 27

This book is a fascinating and erudite canter through a complex episode in European history [... T]his latest volume brings together a host of academic, legal and political science luminaries from the UK, Ireland and mainland Europe. They contribute different chapters to what is a detailed commentary on the Withdrawal Agreement, the history behind it and what the future might look like. The book contains an eye-catching foreword from Michel Barnier, the chief EU Brexit negotiator [...] The editing of the book is superb (including footnotes and index) and each chapter helpfully sets out what it is going to cover [...] Over 300 pages, the writers' contributions are blended together logically and seamlessly [...] This reviewer would give it top marks for putting together a scalable yet in-depth study of a document which has profound constitutional implications both for the UK and the EU.