Television Courtroom Broadcasting

Distraction Effects and Eye-Tracking

Inbunden, Engelska, 2012

959 kr

Beställningsvara. Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar. Fri frakt för medlemmar vid köp för minst 249 kr.

Are witnesses, jurors, or others in courtrooms distracted by in-court television cameras and their operators? Citing a lack of evidence one way or the other, the US Supreme Court has recommended additional research on the matter. Answering the court’s recommendation, this proof-of-concept study demonstrates for the first time that eye-tracking technology can now accurately determine whether courtroom actors look at the television cameras in the courtroom and for how long. In doing so, Television Courtroom Broadcasting opens the door to a new era of research on the effects of in-court distraction.

Produktinformation

Utgivningsdatum2012-12-15
Mått178 x 229 x 14 mm
Vikt581 g
FormatInbunden
SpråkEngelska
Antal sidor223
FörlagIntellect
ISBN9781841506470

Tillhör följande kategorier

Medievetenskap inom Samhälle och politik
Rättsordning inom Juridik
Samhälle och kultur inom Samhälle och politik

Chapter 1: Introduction Chapter 2: Empirical Effects Studies Chapter 3: Considering Distraction Effects Research Chapter 4: Effects and Courtroom Participants/Actors Chapter 5: Distraction and General Research Studies Chapter 6: Legal-psychology and Eye-tracking Chapter 7: The Eye-tracking Distraction Solution Chapter 8: The First TCB Eye-tracking DemonstrationChapter 9: The Judge Chapter 10: The Witness Chapter 11: The Solicitor/Barrister/Lawyer Chapter 12: Location Issues Chapter 13: Conclusion Appendix 1: Diagrams from Short Report Study

'In Television Courtroom Broadcasting: Distraction Effects and Eye Tracking, Paul Lambert tackles a very sensitive and controversial topic - Television Courtroom Broadcasting and its effects, which has been actively or passively ostracized not only by government, law departments, but by the scientific community as well. With this book, he showed that a New World of research on the effects of in-court distraction is waiting. In fact, “eye tracking kills the subjective reports stars” and eye movements, as true direct measure of importance, should serve in future, as a reliable source of information for Judges, Lawyers and Policy-makers.'