Drawing on Alain Badiou’s notion of ‘the subject of the event,’ Huber leads the way out of a conceptual deadlock that has informed much of contemporary literary studies. Having less agency than the premodern ‘subject-supposed-to-be-autonomous,’ but more agency than the postmodern subject ‘supposed-to-be-a-victim-of-discursive-circumstance,’ the ‘subject of the event’ allows to think a precarious, invariably site- and time-specific subjectivity that is not either active or passive, but active and passive simultaneously. In a number of brilliantly provocative readings of contemporary American fiction, Huber asks what it means for this new subject – or should I simply say ‘us’? – to be ‘faithful’ or also ‘unfaithful’ to the event. What ultimately drives the book’s argument is Badiou’s equally pressing and acute question of ’how are we to be faithful to changing the world within the world itself?’ On this background, Huber’s book promises to become itself somewhat of an event.