Scottish Feminist Judgments

Sharon Cowan is Professor of Feminist and Queer Legal Studies at University of Edinburgh, Scotland.Chloë Kennedy is Senior Lecturer in Criminal Law at University of Edinburgh, Scotland.Vanessa E Munro is Professor of Law at University of Warwick, England.

• PART ICRIME, VICTIMISATION AND VIOLENCE3. Smith v Lees 1997 SCCR 139 Judgment: Ilona Cairns Commentary: Isla Callander Reflective Statement: Ilona Cairns 4. McKearney v HM Advocate 2004 JC 87 Judgment: Pamela Ferguson Commentary: Clare McGlynn Reflective Statement: Pamela Ferguson 5. Ruxton v Lang 1998 SCCR 1 Judgment: Sharon Cowan and Vanessa E Munro Commentary: Liz Campbell Reflective Statement: Sharon Cowan and Vanessa E Munro 6. Drury v HM Advocate 2001 SLT 1013 Judgment: Claire McDiarmid Commentary: Juliette Casey Reflective Statement: Claire McDiarmid PART IIFAMILY, HOME AND BELONGING7. R & F v UK Application 35738/05 2005 Judgment: Carolynn Gray Commentary: Becky Kaufmann Reflective Statement: Carolynn Gray 8. White v White 2001 SC 689Judgment: Kenneth NorrieCommentary: Rosie Harding Reflective Statement: Kenneth Norrie 9. Coyle v Coyle 2004 Fam LR 2 Judgment: Jane Mair Commentary: Gillian Black Reflective Statement: Jane Mair 10. Scottish Special Housing Association v Lumsden 1984 SLT (Sh Ct ) 71 Judgment: Peter Robson Commentary: Alexander Latham-Gambi Reflective Statement: Peter Robson Artists’ Statements and Illustrations between pages 222 and 22311. Rafique v Amin 1997 SLT 1385 Judgment: Frankie McCarthy Commentary: Bonnie Holligan Reflective Statement: Frankie McCarthy PART IIIRELATIONAL DUTIES, EQUALITY AND DISCRIMINATION12. Jex-Blake v Senatus Academicus of the University of Edinburgh (1873) 11 M 784Judgment: Chloë Kennedy Commentary: Stephen Bogle Reflective Statement: Chloë Kennedy 13. Rainey v Greater Glasgow Health Board [1987] AC 224, HL Judgment: Nicole Busby Commentary: Diamond AshiagborReflective Statement: Nicole Busby 14. Commonwealth Oil & Gas Co Ltd v Baxter and Another [2009] CSIH 75 Judgment: Alice Belcher Commentary: Anindita Jaiswal Reflective Statement: Alice Belcher 15. Greater Glasgow Health Board v Doogan & Another [2014] UKSC 68 Judgment: Agomoni Ganguli-Mitra and Emily Postan Commentary: Mary Neal Reflective Statement: Agomoni Ganguli-Mitra and Emily Postan PART IVCITIZENSHIP, CULTURE AND PROTECTION16. Helen Johnson (AP) v IAT 2004 (P340/04), Court of Session Judgment: Nicola Loughran Commentary: Helen Baillot Reflective Statement: Nicola Loughran 17. Rape Crisis Centre v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2000 SC 527 Judgment: Dimitrios Kagiaros Commentary: Sandy Brindley Reflective Statement: Dimitrios Kagiaros 18. Salvesen v Riddell [2013] UKSC 236 Judgment: Aileen McHarg and Donald Nicolson Commentary: Shazia Choudhry Reflective Statement: Aileen McHarg and Donald Nicolson

There are several striking aspects to this publication. The analysis is refreshingly revealing about the potential for legal institutions, rules, actors and norms to attune more closely to inclusion and diversity in a sense well beyond feminism … This book brings rightful reflection to the very heart of a legal system’s ability to address life as it is lived, and to explore potential to break down rather than perpetuate inequalities.