Science as It Could Have Been

Discussing the Contingency/Inevitability Problem

Inbunden, Engelska, 2015

Av Lena Soler, Emiliano Trizio, Andrew Pickering

1 129 kr

Tillfälligt slut

Could all or part of our taken-as-established scientific conclusions, theories, experimental data, ontological commitments, and so forth have been significantly different? Science as It Could Have Been focuses on a crucial issue that contemporary science studies have often neglected: the issue of contingency within science. It considers a number of case studies, past and present, from a wide range of scientific disciplines—physics, biology, geology, mathematics, and psychology—to explore whether components of human science are inevitable, or if we could have developed an alternative successful science based on essentially different notions, conceptions, and results. Bringing together a group of distinguished contributors in philosophy, sociology, and history of science, this edited volume offers a comprehensive analysis of the contingency/inevitability problem and a lively and up-to-date portrait of current debates in science studies.

Produktinformation

Utgivningsdatum2015-11-30
Mått152 x 229 x 38 mm
Vikt786 g
FormatInbunden
SpråkEngelska
Antal sidor472
FörlagUniversity of Pittsburgh Press
ISBN9780822944454

Tillhör följande kategorier

Naturvetenskapens filosofi inom Naturvetenskap och teknik

Lena Soler (Editor) Léna Soler is associate professor of philosophy of science at the University of Lorraine. She is the author of Introduction à l’épistémologie and editor of Science after the Practice Turn in the Philosophy, History, and Social Studies of Science.Emiliano Trizio (Editor) Emiliano Trizio is an instructor of philosophy of science at Seattle University.Andrew Pickering (Editor) Andrew Pickering is professor of sociology and philosophy at the University of Exeter. He is the author of Constructing Quarks, The Mangle of Practice, and The Cybernetic Brain: Sketches of Another Future.

A great merit of this volume is that it provides the sophisticated framework that the contingency debate has needed. The editors and contributors are to be commended for presenting the contingency debate so fully. 'Science as It Could Have Been' is a powerful defense of the contingency of our science but also-perhaps more importantly-of our ways of thinking philosophically about it. If the history of science could have gone differently, then so, too, could the history of the philosophy of science.