Andrew E. Larsen, Ph.D. (1998) in Medieval History, University of Wisconsin-Madison, teaches history at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and Marquette University. He has published numerous articles on heresy and academic condemnation in England.

• Acknowledgements ...ixAbbreviations ...xi1. Introduction ...1The Purpose of This Book ... 1Concepts of Heresy ... 5Pertinacity and Condemnation ...10The Problem of Terminology ...12The Process of Academic Condemnation at Paris ...14The Treatment of Heresy outside the University...182. The Condemnation of 1277 ...25Robert Kilwardby and the Background to theCondemnation of 1277 ...26Kilwardby’s Involvement ...31The Condemnation Itself ...38Conclusions ...403. The Condemnation of 1284 and the Condemnation of Richard Knapwell ...42The Main Players ...42The War of the Corrections ...45The Condemnation of 1284 ...46The Condemnation Itself ...48The Case of Richard Knapwell ...574. The Condemnation of 1315 ...64Oxford in the Early Fourteenth Century ...64The Record of the Condemnation ...67The Scholar Involved ...68The Condemnation Process ...71The Later History of the Propositions ...735. The Investigation into William of Ockham ...76William of Ockham and John Lutterell ...76Lutterell’s Removal from Offi ce ...78Ockham at the Provincial Chapter ...83Lutterell’s Denunciation of Ockham ...86The Process at Avignon, in brief ...906. The Case of Friar John ...92John Kedington ...92Mendicant Privileges, Archbishop FitzRalph, and the Debate over Dominium ...94The Events Leading to the Condemnation ...98Kedington’s Appeal...100The Punishment ...1037. The Case of Uthred of Boldon and William Jordan ...109Uthred of Boldon and William Jordan ...109Uthred’s Th eology ...111The Quarrel between Uthred and Jordan ...114Archbishop Langham Intervenes ...118The Condemnation ...120Deeper Considerations ...1248. John Wyclif ...127Wyclif ’s History ...127The Condemnation of a Franciscan ...129The St Paul’s Trial ...131The Attempted Condemnation of 1377 ...133Barton’s Condemnation ...148The Blackfriars Council ...164Wyclif Goes Unpunished ...1759. The Oxford Lollards ...177The Main Figures ...177The Emergence of Wyclif ’s Followers as a Group ...181The Radical Sermons and the Controversy at Oxford ...182The Second Session of the Blackfriars Council ...189The Meeting at Totenhale ...193The Third through Sixth Sessions of the Blackfriars Council ...195The Seventh Session of the Blackfriars Council ...203The Failed Condemnation of Crumpe and Stokes ...204Causes of the Strife at Oxford ...20710. The Condemnation of Henry Crumpe ...210The First Condemnation of Henry Crumpe...210Crumpe at Oxford ...212The First Session at Stamford ...213The Second Session at Stamford...217 11. The Condemnation of Richard Flemmyng ...222Richard Flemmyng ...222Arundel’s Constitutions ...223The Condemnation of Flemmyng ...225Flemmyng’s Appeals ...227Conclusions ...230 12. The Authority of the University to Condemn Heresy ...232The Chancellor’s Office and Powers ...234Appeals from the Chancellor’s Court ...237Punishments ...238The Right of Condemnation for Heresy ...240Formal Authority in the Individual Cases ...241Archbishop Arundel and the University of Oxford ...250 13. Libertas inquirendi at Oxford ...254The Debate over ‘Pelagiansim’ at Oxford ...256Academic Freedom in Medieval Universities ...258Responses to the Condemnations of 1277, 1284, and 1286 ...260The Absence of Condemnation as Evidence for Libertas Inquirendi ...267The Dynamics of Libertas Inquirendi ...268Arundel’s Constitutions ...270 14. Non-Theological Factors in Academic Condemnation ...273Inter-Order Tension as a Cause of Condemnation ...273Other Political Issues ...280The Dynamic of Condemnation ...282Punishment ...284The Role of Unanimity in Academic Condemnations ...287 15. A Closing Thought ...292 Appendix: Known Cases of Academic Condemnation at Oxford ...295Bibliography ...301Index ...313

"...Andrew E. Larsen’s study is an excellent historical and doctrinal analysis of accusations of heresy leveled against various academicians related to the University of Oxford during the period in question.The author has carefully designated the parameters of his study so as to limit its scope and purview..."Girard J. Etzkorn, The Catholic Historical Review, July 2013

Andrew E. Larsen, Ph.D. (1998) in Medieval History, University of Wisconsin-Madison, teaches history at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and Marquette University. He has published numerous articles on heresy and academic condemnation in England.

• Acknowledgements ...ixAbbreviations ...xi1. Introduction ...1The Purpose of This Book ... 1Concepts of Heresy ... 5Pertinacity and Condemnation ...10The Problem of Terminology ...12The Process of Academic Condemnation at Paris ...14The Treatment of Heresy outside the University...182. The Condemnation of 1277 ...25Robert Kilwardby and the Background to theCondemnation of 1277 ...26Kilwardby’s Involvement ...31The Condemnation Itself ...38Conclusions ...403. The Condemnation of 1284 and the Condemnation of Richard Knapwell ...42The Main Players ...42The War of the Corrections ...45The Condemnation of 1284 ...46The Condemnation Itself ...48The Case of Richard Knapwell ...574. The Condemnation of 1315 ...64Oxford in the Early Fourteenth Century ...64The Record of the Condemnation ...67The Scholar Involved ...68The Condemnation Process ...71The Later History of the Propositions ...735. The Investigation into William of Ockham ...76William of Ockham and John Lutterell ...76Lutterell’s Removal from Offi ce ...78Ockham at the Provincial Chapter ...83Lutterell’s Denunciation of Ockham ...86The Process at Avignon, in brief ...906. The Case of Friar John ...92John Kedington ...92Mendicant Privileges, Archbishop FitzRalph, and the Debate over Dominium ...94The Events Leading to the Condemnation ...98Kedington’s Appeal...100The Punishment ...1037. The Case of Uthred of Boldon and William Jordan ...109Uthred of Boldon and William Jordan ...109Uthred’s Th eology ...111The Quarrel between Uthred and Jordan ...114Archbishop Langham Intervenes ...118The Condemnation ...120Deeper Considerations ...1248. John Wyclif ...127Wyclif ’s History ...127The Condemnation of a Franciscan ...129The St Paul’s Trial ...131The Attempted Condemnation of 1377 ...133Barton’s Condemnation ...148The Blackfriars Council ...164Wyclif Goes Unpunished ...1759. The Oxford Lollards ...177The Main Figures ...177The Emergence of Wyclif ’s Followers as a Group ...181The Radical Sermons and the Controversy at Oxford ...182The Second Session of the Blackfriars Council ...189The Meeting at Totenhale ...193The Third through Sixth Sessions of the Blackfriars Council ...195The Seventh Session of the Blackfriars Council ...203The Failed Condemnation of Crumpe and Stokes ...204Causes of the Strife at Oxford ...20710. The Condemnation of Henry Crumpe ...210The First Condemnation of Henry Crumpe...210Crumpe at Oxford ...212The First Session at Stamford ...213The Second Session at Stamford...217 11. The Condemnation of Richard Flemmyng ...222Richard Flemmyng ...222Arundel’s Constitutions ...223The Condemnation of Flemmyng ...225Flemmyng’s Appeals ...227Conclusions ...230 12. The Authority of the University to Condemn Heresy ...232The Chancellor’s Office and Powers ...234Appeals from the Chancellor’s Court ...237Punishments ...238The Right of Condemnation for Heresy ...240Formal Authority in the Individual Cases ...241Archbishop Arundel and the University of Oxford ...250 13. Libertas inquirendi at Oxford ...254The Debate over ‘Pelagiansim’ at Oxford ...256Academic Freedom in Medieval Universities ...258Responses to the Condemnations of 1277, 1284, and 1286 ...260The Absence of Condemnation as Evidence for Libertas Inquirendi ...267The Dynamics of Libertas Inquirendi ...268Arundel’s Constitutions ...270 14. Non-Theological Factors in Academic Condemnation ...273Inter-Order Tension as a Cause of Condemnation ...273Other Political Issues ...280The Dynamic of Condemnation ...282Punishment ...284The Role of Unanimity in Academic Condemnations ...287 15. A Closing Thought ...292 Appendix: Known Cases of Academic Condemnation at Oxford ...295Bibliography ...301Index ...313

"...Andrew E. Larsen’s study is an excellent historical and doctrinal analysis of accusations of heresy leveled against various academicians related to the University of Oxford during the period in question.The author has carefully designated the parameters of his study so as to limit its scope and purview..."Girard J. Etzkorn, The Catholic Historical Review, July 2013

Andrew E. Larsen, Ph.D. (1998) in Medieval History, University of Wisconsin-Madison, teaches history at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and Marquette University. He has published numerous articles on heresy and academic condemnation in England.

• Acknowledgements ...ixAbbreviations ...xi1. Introduction ...1The Purpose of This Book ... 1Concepts of Heresy ... 5Pertinacity and Condemnation ...10The Problem of Terminology ...12The Process of Academic Condemnation at Paris ...14The Treatment of Heresy outside the University...182. The Condemnation of 1277 ...25Robert Kilwardby and the Background to theCondemnation of 1277 ...26Kilwardby’s Involvement ...31The Condemnation Itself ...38Conclusions ...403. The Condemnation of 1284 and the Condemnation of Richard Knapwell ...42The Main Players ...42The War of the Corrections ...45The Condemnation of 1284 ...46The Condemnation Itself ...48The Case of Richard Knapwell ...574. The Condemnation of 1315 ...64Oxford in the Early Fourteenth Century ...64The Record of the Condemnation ...67The Scholar Involved ...68The Condemnation Process ...71The Later History of the Propositions ...735. The Investigation into William of Ockham ...76William of Ockham and John Lutterell ...76Lutterell’s Removal from Offi ce ...78Ockham at the Provincial Chapter ...83Lutterell’s Denunciation of Ockham ...86The Process at Avignon, in brief ...906. The Case of Friar John ...92John Kedington ...92Mendicant Privileges, Archbishop FitzRalph, and the Debate over Dominium ...94The Events Leading to the Condemnation ...98Kedington’s Appeal...100The Punishment ...1037. The Case of Uthred of Boldon and William Jordan ...109Uthred of Boldon and William Jordan ...109Uthred’s Th eology ...111The Quarrel between Uthred and Jordan ...114Archbishop Langham Intervenes ...118The Condemnation ...120Deeper Considerations ...1248. John Wyclif ...127Wyclif ’s History ...127The Condemnation of a Franciscan ...129The St Paul’s Trial ...131The Attempted Condemnation of 1377 ...133Barton’s Condemnation ...148The Blackfriars Council ...164Wyclif Goes Unpunished ...1759. The Oxford Lollards ...177The Main Figures ...177The Emergence of Wyclif ’s Followers as a Group ...181The Radical Sermons and the Controversy at Oxford ...182The Second Session of the Blackfriars Council ...189The Meeting at Totenhale ...193The Third through Sixth Sessions of the Blackfriars Council ...195The Seventh Session of the Blackfriars Council ...203The Failed Condemnation of Crumpe and Stokes ...204Causes of the Strife at Oxford ...20710. The Condemnation of Henry Crumpe ...210The First Condemnation of Henry Crumpe...210Crumpe at Oxford ...212The First Session at Stamford ...213The Second Session at Stamford...217 11. The Condemnation of Richard Flemmyng ...222Richard Flemmyng ...222Arundel’s Constitutions ...223The Condemnation of Flemmyng ...225Flemmyng’s Appeals ...227Conclusions ...230 12. The Authority of the University to Condemn Heresy ...232The Chancellor’s Office and Powers ...234Appeals from the Chancellor’s Court ...237Punishments ...238The Right of Condemnation for Heresy ...240Formal Authority in the Individual Cases ...241Archbishop Arundel and the University of Oxford ...250 13. Libertas inquirendi at Oxford ...254The Debate over ‘Pelagiansim’ at Oxford ...256Academic Freedom in Medieval Universities ...258Responses to the Condemnations of 1277, 1284, and 1286 ...260The Absence of Condemnation as Evidence for Libertas Inquirendi ...267The Dynamics of Libertas Inquirendi ...268Arundel’s Constitutions ...270 14. Non-Theological Factors in Academic Condemnation ...273Inter-Order Tension as a Cause of Condemnation ...273Other Political Issues ...280The Dynamic of Condemnation ...282Punishment ...284The Role of Unanimity in Academic Condemnations ...287 15. A Closing Thought ...292 Appendix: Known Cases of Academic Condemnation at Oxford ...295Bibliography ...301Index ...313

"...Andrew E. Larsen’s study is an excellent historical and doctrinal analysis of accusations of heresy leveled against various academicians related to the University of Oxford during the period in question.The author has carefully designated the parameters of his study so as to limit its scope and purview..."Girard J. Etzkorn, The Catholic Historical Review, July 2013