Routledge International Handbook on Electoral Debates

Julio Juárez-Gámiz is an associate researcher at the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM). He has lectured on topics ranging from political communication, electoral law, journalism, discourse analysis, media and mass communication theories at different Mexican and English Universities. Julio has coordinated different national and multicultural studies on campaigns and elections, media coverage and political communications funded by the National Electoral Institute, IBOPE/AGB (now Nielsen-Ibope), the United Nations Development Program and the Mexican Secretary of State. He served as advisor to the President of the National Electoral Institute from 2015 to 2018.Christina Holtz-Bacha is Professor of Communications at the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg and Past Chair of the International Communication's Associations (ICA) Political Communication Division. Professor Holtz-Bacha has held positions at the University of Mainz, University of Munich, the University of Bochum, the University of Minnesota—Minneapolis, and was a Fellow at the Shorenstein Center/John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University in 1999. Her research and instruction focus on political communication and strategic communication as well as German and European media policy. Alan Schroeder is Professor Emeritus in the School of Journalism at Northeastern University and has worked as a journalist, television producer, and diplomat. Schroeder has written about a variety of media-related topics for such outlets as Politico, the New York Times, Washington Post, Boston Globe, Huffington Post, and Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. His work in media and politics extends internationally. He has lectured about the global phenomenon of televised debates in Spain, Germany, Denmark, the Netherlands, and Colombia. He has also trained television reporters and producers in the South Pacific and addressed journalists from China, Afghanistan, Uzbekistan, and various countries in Latin America.

• Introduction: Image, Deliberation and Symbolic Power: Why do Electoral Debates Matter? 1. Introduction: Televised Election Debates as Spectacle and Reflection Part 1: Electoral Debates in the Americas Introduction to Electoral Debates in the Americas 2. A New Experiment for an Old Media Political Event: Leaders’ Debates in Canada 3. From JFK to Trump: The Evolution of U.S. Presidential Debates 4. Did Video Kill the Rally Star? The Contribution of Presidential Debates to Democratic Change in Mexico 5. Electoral Debates Organized by the Electoral Management Body: Costa Rica 2018 6. Presidential Debates in Colombia. From Rarity to Routine 7. Electoral Debates in Peru 2001 – 2016 8. Chile: Presidential Debates, From Dictatorship To Democracy 9. Presidential Debates in Argentina 10. Televised Presidential Debates in Brazil Part 2: Europe Introduction to Europe 11. Planets Seldom Align – A Hit And The Misses Of United Kingdom TV Election Debates 12. Austria: On the Road to Peak TV Debate? 13. Swedish Election Debates: A Long Tradition Adapting to NTw times 14. From the Heavyweights' Debate to the Duel: the Development of TV Debates in Germany 15. Road to the Stadium: Televised Election Debates and "Non-Debates" in Ukraine. Between Spectacle and Democratic Instrument 16. Televised Debates in Croatia: Lost in Regulation 17. Televised Election Debates in The Netherlands: Indirect Effects on Party pPreferences through Media Coverage 18. Electoral Debates in Spain: From TV to Social Networks 19. French Television Debates: Just Audience or True Influence? Part 3: Select Cases of Electoral Debates across Different Regions Introduction to Select Cases of Electoral Debates across Different Regions 20. Presidential Debates in Iran 21. Transformation of the Electoral Debate in Japan: Its Content and Context 22. Televised Election Debates in Multi-party Taiwan 23. Electoral Debates in South Korea: From TV debates to YouTube Debates 24. The 2016 Pilipinas Debates 25. New Zealand Election Debates – Combat and Commercialism 26. Leaders Debates in Australian Elections 27. Political Showmanship: A Critical Analysis of Electoral Debates in Kenya 28. Do Debates Matter? The Past, Present and Future of Nigerian Electoral Debates

'Those planning to produce or research political debates will welcome a comprehensive update outlining the happenings in the International Debate arena. This volume offers practical insights for those engaging political debates as part of applied Democracy.'Allan Louden, Department Chair and Professor of Communications, Wake Forest University'The Handbook illustrates the exponential growth of political debates worldwide over the past twenty years. Regardless of world region, political structure, or cultural differences, there are universal rules, impacts, and challenges. There are also significant differences influenced by a variety of factors. The Handbook fills a major void in the literature for anyone teaching or studying political debates and for anyone advising debate sponsors.'Diana B. Carlin, Professor Emerita, Saint Louis University'As this remarkably fine Handbook documents, candidate debates are now central to election campaigns in most democracies world-wide. Their organisation and conduct are influenced by underlying political systems and cultures but have evolved over time due largely to the fragmentation of party systems and multiplication of news channels. Head-to-head two-person duels have consequently often been supplemented or replaced by multi-party programmes. Many differences emerge in the book’s 28 national chapters; how regulated (if at all), the offices requiring debates, whether mandatory or not, participation eligibility, number and sequencing of debates, debate formats, moderators (who and in what roles), and any audience involvement. Certain near-universal features, despite these differences, are particularly important. Leader debates typically attract very large audiences, including many normally only marginally attentive voters. Sometimes viewers have expressed disappointment after the contests, complaining that debaters’ comments had been overly scripted, cautious or repetitive. Nevertheless, significant effects on knowledge gain about issues and policies have been found from research when conducted - and more so among initially less politically involved voters. As the editors rightly conclude, when this is done fairly, debates can focus voters’ attention on a combination of public policy, issues and personality traits.'Jay Blumler, Emeritus Professor of Public Communication, Leeds University