Revolution and Disenchantment

Fadi A. Bardawil is Assistant Professor of Asian and Middle East Studies at Duke University.

• A Note on Transliteration and Translation  ixPrologue  xiIntroduction  1Part I. Time of History1. O Youth, O Arabs, O Nationalists: Recalling the High Tides of Anticolonial Pan-Arabism  272. Dreams of a Dual Birth: Socialist Lebanon's Theoretical Imaginary (1964–1970)  533. June 1967 and Its Historiographical Afterlives  82Part II. Times of the Sociocultural4. Paradoxes of Emancipation: Revolution and Power in Light of Mao  1135. Exit Marx/Enter Ibn Khaldun: Wartime Disenchantment and Critique  1386. Traveling Theory and Political Practice: Orientalism in the Age of the Islamic Revolution  165Epilogue  187Acknowledgments  195Notes  201Bibliography  241Index  255

“Fadi A. Bardawil's Revolution and Disenchantment is at once a rich redescription and rehistoricization of the rise and fall of the Lebanese New Left, and an exemplary illustration of how to rework the problem of theory in relation to the practices of nonmetropolitan political intellectuals. With a timely attunement to the paradoxical conundrums of his present and an uncommon generosity of spirit, Bardawil challenges us to reconceive the contemporary demand for a dialogue between Arab intellectual traditions and the traditions of Western critical theory.” - David Scott, Columbia University “Conceptually brilliant, prodigiously researched, and appealingly written, Revolution and Disenchantment tracks the theoretical innovations and political stakes of Arab revolutionary Marxism in the postwar era, contributing to timely debates about the necessity of decolonizing critical theory and the relationship between revolutionary militancy and political disenchantment. Fadi A. Bardawil's innovative archival excavation recovers the theoretical labor of Arab intellectuals, theorists, and militants from Lebanon, Syria, Egypt, and Palestine in the midst of a multiplicity of political upheavals.” - Omnia El Shakry, author of (The Arabic Freud: Psychoanalysis and Islam in Modern Egypt) "Is the question of social inequality eclipsed by sectarianism in the Near East? Is it possible to found a Left which is both autonomous and critical of nationalism? Fadi Bardawil brings this important episode of theoretical elaboration back to the history of Arab thought. Further, he invites us to break away from the colonial perspective which stipulates that social theory is created in the North and applied to the South." (translated from French) - Jean-Michel Landry (Le Monde Diplomatique) "Revolution and Disenchantment brings Lebanon back into the story of the twentieth century francophone left and elegantly delivers a new framework for understanding the translation and transformation of theory." - Sarah K. Miles (Global Intellectual History) “Revolution and Disenchantment…dismantles the ‘critique of Eurocentrism’ as the only way to conduct critical scholarship in Arab thought. Most significantly, it deftly and incisively performs the theoretical ground-clearing that will enable scholars of Arab and postcolonial thought to stage the fine-grained, sustained, generous-yet-critical readings of Arab intellectuals as thinkers….” - Yasmeen Daifallah (Postcolonial Studies) "Revolution and Disenchantment is a different kind of academic book, profoundly interdisciplinary as it weaves together the crux of postcolonial studies, intellectual history, political theory and anthropological inquiries…. The book truly pries open the epistemological categories of modern social sciences." - Myriam Amri (LSE Review of Books) "This volume is an impressive example of critical scholarship examining the intellectual and political dynamics of the modern history of Lebanon and its Arab neighbors. It vividly demonstrates the revolutionary hope and political disenchantment that continue to characterize the Middle East today." - A. Rassam (Choice) “[Bardawil’s] thoughtful excavation of [a] forgotten archive of Arab Marxist theory, critical attention to social and political conditions, and nuanced analysis of the relationship between theory and practice produce a provocative argument about the pitfalls of adopting binary visions of power relations.” - Kevin M. Jones (American Historical Review)