Rethinking Law and Language

Jan M. Broekman, Dean and Professor of Law Emeritus, Law Faculty, KU Leuven, Belgium and Distinguished Visiting Professor, Penn State Law, PSU, US

• Contents: 1. Rethinking Speech 2. Hobbes’ Frontispiece 3. Von Savigny’s ‘People’ 4. Signs Signify 5. Structuralism And Law 6. Alter’s Presence 7. What Language, What Law? 8. Word, Seme, Digit 9. The Flagship’s Wreckage References Index

'Ties between law and language have always been of interest in socially problematic situations as well as in legal and speech events in everyday life. Rethinking them brings us to Thomas Hobbes' Leviathan and later developments in Central European jurisprudence, to Marxian considerations, structuralism and sign theories. Unique in this book is the author's focus on problems with the two faces of language: the analog and the digital, on the basis of which our smart phones and Artificial Intelligence create modern life. How does law answer that challenge and is developing cyberlaw enough? Such questions remain unanswered as long as we do not focus on our personal responsibility for the event we call ''speech'' - the name of the flagship language - no matter whether we speak, Tweet or write on Facebook.'--Frank Fleerackers, KU Leuven, Belgium'A central thesis of this book is its recognition of the double definition of the term ''word'', which has also been neglected in studies of law and language relations. A ''word'' exists in analog and digital types of language, whereas conversions among those types seem to catastrophically diminish the appreciation and effects of a renewed appeal to personal responsibility inherent to speech. Any philosophy of the language-law relationship, the book suggests, should establish ''digit studies'': a branch that studies the digital media structures and its effects on languages around the globe.'--Anne Wagner, Lille University, France'I am struck by the way in which the book very convincingly weaves the idea of ''legal consciousness'' into the larger framework of legal semiotics, making the former inescapably an essential element of the latter. By all rights: that should serve as the headwater of a broad flow of discourse on the nature of law and language. Let's hope that this endeavour finds a good number of intelligent readers who are moved to respond.'--Philip T. Grier, Dickinson College, US