Restrictive Practices in Health Care and Disability Settings

Bernadette McSherry is the foundation director of the Melbourne Social Equity Institute and an adjunct professor of law at the University of Melbourne. She has degrees in law, arts and psychology, with a PhD from York University, Canada. She is the Immediate past president of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law and was a legal member of the Mental Health Tribunal of Victoria from 2001 to 2018. She has written widely in the fields of mental health law and criminal law and is currently a commissioner of the Royal Commission into Victoria’s Mental Health System and a commissioner with the Victorian Law Reform Commission.Yvette Maker is a senior research associate in the Melbourne Social Equity Institute at the University of Melbourne. Her work focuses on the disability- and gender-related dimensions of law, policy and practice. She has a special interest in disability human rights law, social security law and policy, and the design and regulation of social care and support systems. She holds bachelor of arts and bachelor of laws (hons) degrees from Murdoch University, and a PhD from the University of Melbourne. Yvette’s sole-authored book, Care and Support Rights After Neoliberalism: Balancing Competing Claims Through Law and Policy, is forthcoming.

• Part I: Background: Rationales and options for reform1. Restrictive practices: options and opportunitiesBernadette McSherry and Yvette Maker2. Ending restraint: an insider viewCath Roper, Mary O’Hagan, Hamilton Kennedy and Helena RoennfeldtPart II: Designing legislation and policy to support changeIntroduction to Part II3. Human rights and rapid tranquillisationPeter Bartlett and Stephanie Sampson4. The regulation of restrictive practices on people with intellectual impairment: the challenges and opportunities posed by a rights-based approach Kim Chandler5. Beyond restraint: gender-sensitive regulation of the control of women’s behaviour in Australian mental health and disability servicesYvette Maker6. Attempts to reduce the use of restrictive interventions in England between 2014 and 2019Guy CrossPart III: Implementing and monitoring reformIntroduction to Part III7. Legal regulation and policy on the use of restraint and coercive measures in health care institutions in the NetherlandsLisa Waddington8. Queensland’s new physical restraint framework: implementation and lessons since the commencement of the Mental Health Act 2016John Allan and Amber Manwaring9. Showing restraint: the uses and limitations of data in supporting restraint reductionGrant Sara10. The Court, the law and German psychiatry’s slow progress towards human rightsMargret Osterfeld and Martin ZinklerPart IV: Changing culture and practiceIntroduction to Part IV11. The intractable use of restraint, organisational culture and ‘othering’: lessons from the Oakden scandalBernadette McSherry12. Being recovery-oriented and reducing the use of restrictive interventions in mental health care: the challenges in achieving transformationLisa Brophy, Justine Fletcher and Bridget Hamilton13. Psychotropic use in Australian aged care homes: what can be done to ensure appropriate use?Juanita Breen (previously Westbury)14. Engaging doctors to reduce restraint: practice and pragmatics around restraint in clinical careNathan GibsonPart V: Conclusions15. Regulating restrictive practices: challenges and possibilitiesBernadette McSherry and Yvette Maker