Peter Charles Hoffer is distinguished research professor of history, University of Georgia, and the author of numerous publications, including Daniel Webster and the Unfinished Constitution; Rutgers v. Waddington: Alexander Hamilton, the End of the War for Independence, and the Origins of Judicial Review; The Free Press Crisis of 1800: Thomas Cooper’s Trial for Seditious Libel; and, with Williamjames Hull Hoffer and N. E. H. Hull, The Supreme Court: An Essential History, Second Edition, all from Kansas.

• Introduction: Reading Law Forward1. John Marshall2. Joseph Story3. Lemuel Shaw4. Louis D. Brandeis5. Benjamin N. Cardozo6. William O. Douglas7. Stephen G. BreyerConclusion: The Making of a Democratic JurisprudenceAcknowledgmentsNotesIndex

"Examining the work of seven leading figures in the history of US jurisprudence, Hoffer shows through sketches of their lives and detailed analysis of some of their most important opinions how each was committed to interpreting the law so that it would continue to contribute to the improvement of social and economic life. To do so they drew upon no single interpretive theory but rather a wide range of materials: text, original understandings, precedents, policy considerations. This is a bracing corrective to arguments that assert that our tradition is firmly committed to a single interpretive approach that disdains attention to policy and good outcomes."—Mark Tushnet, William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Law, emeritus, Harvard Law School, and author of Red, White, and Blue: A Critical Analysis of Constitutional Law

Peter Charles Hoffer is distinguished research professor of history, University of Georgia, and the author of numerous publications, including Daniel Webster and the Unfinished Constitution; Rutgers v. Waddington: Alexander Hamilton, the End of the War for Independence, and the Origins of Judicial Review; The Free Press Crisis of 1800: Thomas Cooper’s Trial for Seditious Libel; and, with Williamjames Hull Hoffer and N. E. H. Hull, The Supreme Court: An Essential History, Second Edition, all from Kansas.

• Introduction: Reading Law Forward1. John Marshall2. Joseph Story3. Lemuel Shaw4. Louis D. Brandeis5. Benjamin N. Cardozo6. William O. Douglas7. Stephen G. BreyerConclusion: The Making of a Democratic JurisprudenceAcknowledgmentsNotesIndex

"Examining the work of seven leading figures in the history of US jurisprudence, Hoffer shows through sketches of their lives and detailed analysis of some of their most important opinions how each was committed to interpreting the law so that it would continue to contribute to the improvement of social and economic life. To do so they drew upon no single interpretive theory but rather a wide range of materials: text, original understandings, precedents, policy considerations. This is a bracing corrective to arguments that assert that our tradition is firmly committed to a single interpretive approach that disdains attention to policy and good outcomes."—Mark Tushnet, William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Law, emeritus, Harvard Law School, and author of Red, White, and Blue: A Critical Analysis of Constitutional Law

Peter Charles Hoffer is distinguished research professor of history, University of Georgia, and the author of numerous publications, including Daniel Webster and the Unfinished Constitution; Rutgers v. Waddington: Alexander Hamilton, the End of the War for Independence, and the Origins of Judicial Review; The Free Press Crisis of 1800: Thomas Cooper’s Trial for Seditious Libel; and, with Williamjames Hull Hoffer and N. E. H. Hull, The Supreme Court: An Essential History, Second Edition, all from Kansas.

• Introduction: Reading Law Forward1. John Marshall2. Joseph Story3. Lemuel Shaw4. Louis D. Brandeis5. Benjamin N. Cardozo6. William O. Douglas7. Stephen G. BreyerConclusion: The Making of a Democratic JurisprudenceAcknowledgmentsNotesIndex

"Examining the work of seven leading figures in the history of US jurisprudence, Hoffer shows through sketches of their lives and detailed analysis of some of their most important opinions how each was committed to interpreting the law so that it would continue to contribute to the improvement of social and economic life. To do so they drew upon no single interpretive theory but rather a wide range of materials: text, original understandings, precedents, policy considerations. This is a bracing corrective to arguments that assert that our tradition is firmly committed to a single interpretive approach that disdains attention to policy and good outcomes."—Mark Tushnet, William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Law, emeritus, Harvard Law School, and author of Red, White, and Blue: A Critical Analysis of Constitutional Law