Public Finance of the Dutch Republic in Comparative Perspective

Wantje Fritschy (Ph.D. Leiden 1988) is retired senior lecturer in Economic and Social History and professor in the History of Early Modern Public Finance at VU University Amsterdam; she has led a large research project on public finance in the Dutch Republic at the Huygens Institute of Netherlands History (Huygens ING) in The Hague.

• LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONSPREFACEGENERAL INTRODUCTIONThe question at stakePossible answersPolitical institutionsMentalityEconomic factors‘Urban systems’ and state formationThe approach of this bookThe structure of this bookPART ONE The development of the fiscal system of the Dutch RepublicIntroduction: a new state0.1 The Union of Utrecht: the start of a new state?0.2 Historical backgrounds and institutional characteristicsFrom Revolt to RepublicThe institutional legacy of the HabsburgsThe States General, Holland, the Council of State and the stadholderThe fiscal articles of the Union of Utrecht0.3 The concept ‘public finance of the Dutch Republic’, the data and the estimatesPublic finance of and in the Dutch RepublicThe reliability of data and estimates1. Financing the first phase of the revolt against Spain (1566-1572)1.1 Calvinist donations and the credit of the Prince of Orange1.2 A prince in search of new sources of finance1.3 The first financial decisions of the ‘free’ States of Holland1.4 Conclusion2. From under-taxed part of an empire to heavily taxed republi2.1 Holland and the Spanish EmpireHolland’s fiscal system under the HabsburgsAlva’s attempt at centralizationCastile’s fiscal system2.2 The development of Holland’s fiscal system until 1609The increasing amounts needed for the warHolland’s ‘tax revolution’Direct and indirect taxesThe tax burden before and after the RevoltLoans as a source of revenue: ‘short’ term obligations and long term annuitiesHolland’s ‘real’ financial revolutionHolland’s fiscal system at the start of the Twelve Years Truce2.3 The other provincesThe importance of ZeelandThe ‘general means’ and the States GeneralThe ‘general means’ and the provinces: urban resistance and urban acceptanceThe ‘quotas-system’ and the fiscal performance of the provinces2.4 The financial scope of the ‘Generality’Former royal domains and other confiscated property as sources of public revenueForeign financial supportGenerality taxesGenerality-loansPrivateers booty and customs (‘convooien en licenten’)2.5 Conclusion3. Public finance of the Dutch Republic in the 17th and 18 th centuries3.1 The increasing public expenditure of the Dutch RepublicWar expenditureDebt serviceOther public expenditure3.2 The resilience of the provincial revenue systemsThe ‘institutional structure’ of the public revenue of the RepublicThe ‘social-economic structure’ of the public revenue of the provincesPrice-increasing taxes on general consumption and tax riotsPrice-increasing indirect taxes on ‘luxury’ consumptionThe increasing role of direct taxationThe ‘tax morale’ of Dutch citizensThe tax burden in Holland and in Overijssel‘Capital’ or ‘coercion’: the role of loans in Dutch war financeA comparison with the centralized tax system of 18073.3 ConclusionPART TWO The fiscal system of the Dutch Republic in international comparative perspectiveIntroduction4. A comparison with the Venetian Republic4.1 Common characteristics and long term differencesMuch in commonDiffering long term domestic developmentsAnother maritime state and its ‘Year of Disaster’4.2 ‘Survive and prosper on the cheap’The structure of public expenditureA ‘peaceful republic’ and an ‘expenditure bottom’?4.3 Taxation in a centralized and a federal urbanized republicDifferences in public revenue and in wealthThe fiscal contributions of ‘centre ’ and ‘periphery’ in the two republics4.4 Differing debt developments‘Mountains of debt’, forced loans and ‘citizenship’Voluntary loans based on trust and private interestDebt sizes, interest burdens and interest ratesPublic banks and public loans in both republics4.5 Conclusion5. A comparison with Great Britain5.1 The comparability of Britain and the Netherlands5.2 National public finance: a long term perspective5.3 Public expenditure in two maritime statesTotal public expenditure before and after c. 1690A comparison of military expenditure before 1688The structure of Dutch and British public expenditure since c. 16905.4 Public revenue in two commercial statesTotal public revenue comparedNon-parliamentary and parliamentary taxationCustoms in a large monarchy and a small republicIndirect taxation, urbanization and centralizationThe EIC, the VOC and public revenue5.5 A comparison of loan financing and public debtForeign merchants and the king’s subjects versus cities and citizensDowning and the Dutch example‘1672’ in BritainThe long road of Britain’s ‘financial revolution’A quantitative comparison of the British and the Dutch public debt5.6 Conclusion6. A comparison with the Ottoman Empire6.1 Two incomparable statesWhy was Ottoman public revenue so low?6.2 Contrastive long term trajectories of state formationContrasting population developmentsContrasting patterns of land use‘State-driven’ versus ‘economy-driven’ urbanization trajectoriesThe consequences for public finance of different urbanization trajectories6.3 A quantitative comparison of public revenueThe extremely low level of state revenue in the Ottoman EmpireThe marginal importance of domestic indirect taxation‘Coin clipping’ as a source of public revenue6.4 Deficits, ‘advance payments’, advances and debtIltizamThe malikane-systemThe esham-systemPublic debts and the interest prohibition6.5 ConclusionGENERAL CONCLUSIONEpilogueAPPENDIX: The taxes in the Dutch RepublicABBREVIATIONSPRIMARY SOURCES AND DATABASESREFERENCESINDEX

"The book is one of the most outstanding results of a long sequence of research that has seen the publication of important works and fundamental datasets on the Dutch public finance during the Ancien Regime. [...] The book is a splendid example of the passion of a scholar who has spent many years in researching and thinking". Luciano Pezzolo, in TIJDSCHRIFT SOCIALE & ECON.GESCHIEDENIS 16 (1), 2019.