Political Competition, Innovation and Growth in the History of Asian Civilizations

Inbunden, Engelska, 2004

2 329 kr

Beställningsvara. Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar. Fri frakt för medlemmar vid köp för minst 249 kr.

Do political decentralisation and inter state competition favour innovation and growth? There has long been a lively debate surrounding this question, going back to David Hume and Immanuel Kant. This book is a new attempt to test its veracity. The existing literature tends to assume that the beneficial effects of inter state competition have been confined to European history. By contrast, China, India and the Islamic Middle East are regarded as inherently imperial and overcentralised. However, these civilisations have not always been unified politically. In their history, there have been long spells of decentralised rule or inter state competition. The same is true for Japan. If the Hume-Kant hypothesis is correct, it should also apply to those periods. This volume analyses the qualitative and quantitative evidence. The authors comprise eminent historians, sociologists, economists and socio-psychologists and the resulting book is a truly interdisciplinary enterprise. Addressing a wide readership, this book will hold strong appeal for scholars and researchers of general, Asian and economic history, political economy, political science and sociology.

Produktinformation

Utgivningsdatum2004-11-26
Mått156 x 234 x undefined mm
FormatInbunden
SpråkEngelska
FörlagEdward Elgar Publishing Ltd
ISBN9781843769194

Tillhör följande kategorier

Contents: Foreword by Eric Jones 1. Introduction and Overview 2. The Political Pattern of Historical Creativity: A Theoretical Case 3. Creative Clusters, Political Fragmentation and Cultural Heterogeneity: An Investigative Journey through Civilizations East and West 4. Lessons from the History of Imperial China 5. Advantages of Centralized and Decentralized Rule in Japan 6. India 7. Islamic Statecraft and the Middle East’s Delayed Modernization Index

'It is impossible for the arts and sciences to arise, at first, among any people unless that people enjoy the blessing of a free government. . . Nothing is more favourable to the rise of politeness and learning than a number of neighbouring and independent states, connected together by commerce and policy. . . Where a number of neighbouring states have great intercourse of arts and commerce, their mutual jealousy keeps them from receiving too lightly the law from each other, in matters of taste and of reasoning, and makes them examine every work of art with the greatest care and accuracy.'