Podcast or Perish

Peer Review and Knowledge Creation for the 21st Century

Häftad, Engelska, 2024

Av Lori Beckstead, Ian M. Cook, Hannah McGregor, Canada) Beckstead, Lori (Ryerson University, Hungary) Cook, Ian M. (Central European University, Canada) McGregor, Hannah (Simon Fraser University, Ian M Cook, Lance Dann, Martin Spinelli

429 kr

Beställningsvara. Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar

Fri frakt för medlemmar vid köp för minst 249 kr.

Finns i fler format (1)

Inbunden

1 289 kr

Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar

The growth of scholarly podcasting engenders radical possibilities for how we conceive of knowledge creation and peer review. By investigating the historical development of the norms of scholarly communication, the unique affordances of sound-based scholarship and the transformative potential of new modes of creating and reviewing expert knowledge, Podcast or Perish is the call to action academia needs, by asking how podcasting might change the very ways we think about scholarly work.

Produktinformation

Utgivningsdatum2024-02-22
Mått140 x 214 x 14 mm
Vikt319 g
FormatHäftad
SpråkEngelska
SerieBloomsbury Podcast Studies
Antal sidor240
FörlagBloomsbury Publishing Plc
ISBN9781501385209

Tillhör följande kategorier

Media och underhållning inom Ekonomi och ledarskap
Radio / podcasts inom Kultur

Lori Beckstead is a podcaster and Associate Professor in the RTA School of Media at Toronto Metropolitan University, Canada, who loves dad jokes, footnotes, and bandying about the word ‘neoliberalism’.Ian M. Cook is an anthropologist from a magical place where giant gingers are produced. He works for OLIve - the Open Learning Initiative in Hungary, which provides adult education for people who have experienced displacement.Hannah McGregor is a podcaster, writer, and Associate Professor of Publishing at Simon Fraser University, Canada. She always has an automated email reply on, even when she’s not on holiday.

This is a unique, innovative, and thorough treatment of the contested subject of peer review and nontraditional scholarly output. The authors deconstruct, critique, and reimagine peer review in general while examining the potential of (and in many cases actual instances of) podcasting peer review as a medium and as a meta forum for reimagining this process. This forward thinking, optimistic, and solution-oriented volume presents a solid case for legitimizing podcasts as scholarly output. As a reader, one feels to be in the room with these authors, as they would want us to – that is, in fact, their central point.