Paul and the Philosophers’ Faith

Suzan Sierksma-Agteres, Ph.D. (2023, University of Groningen) is Assistant Professor of New Testament at the Protestant Theological University in the Netherlands. Combining expertise in classics and theology, she focuses on the interactions between early Christian thought and ancient philosophical traditions.

• Contents PrefaceText Editions and Translations of Ancient and Modern TextsList of FiguresList of Bibliographical AbbreviationsInclusion of Previously Published Work by the Same Author1 Introduction: Tracing the Semantics and Discourses of Faith in Paul’s World1.1 Another Work on Faith?1.2 Faith: How a Semantic Domain Approach Helps to Overcome Essentializing Word Studies1.3 Paul: How Discourse Analysis Helps to Overcome Canonomania and Parallelomania1.4 Philosophers: How Philosophical Contextualization Helps to Overcome Anachronistic Conceptions of Faith1.5 The Route Travelled: Scope, Terminology, Method, and OutlinePart 1: A Pistis Cosmology2 Pistis, Theos, and Logos: Faith as the Standard of Philosophical Religion2.1 Disentangling Modern and Ancient Semantics of Faith2.2 The Problem of Approaching Religion and Faith in the Ancient World2.3 The Theologia Tripartita: Theorizing Religion in Graeco-Roman Discourses2.4 Faith as a Indication of Philosophical Religion in Paul’s Letters2.5 Conclusion3 Pistis, Dikaiosynē, and Nomos: Faith as Unwritten Law of the Golden Age3.1 Paul the Universalist? New Perspectives on an Old Debate3.2 ‘Justification by Faith’: an Outline of the Debated Issues3.3 The Golden Age and Unwritten Law: Juridical Usage of Pistis in Graeco-Roman Discourses3.4 Faith as Unwritten Law and Christ as Living Law in Paul’s Letters3.5 ConclusionPart 2: A Pistis Mentality4 Pistis, Doxa, and Epistēmē: Faith as Firm, Human Conviction Anticipating Divine Knowledge4.1 Faith Opposed to Knowledge?4.2 The Stigma of Early Christian Pistis Being a Low-Level Epistemological Category4.3 A Fideistic Turn in Plato’s Wake? Epistemological Usage of Pistis in Graeco-Roman Discourses4.4 Pistis as Firm but Provisional Knowledge of God in Paul’s Letters4.5 Conclusion5 Pistis, Peithō, and Sophia: Faith as Transformative Persuasion of the Wise5.1 Is Faith a Religious ‘Acceptance as True’?5.2 The Dichotomy of Greek Cognitive Conviction and Jewish Relational Faith5.3 Rhetoric and Dialectic, Scepticism and Dogmatism, Sophism and Sagehood: Persuasive Usage of Pistis in Graeco-Roman Discourses5.4 Faith as Transformative Persuasion in Paul’s Letters5.5 Conclusion6 Pistis, Ēthos, and Mimēsis: Faith as Attitude and Virtue Imitating the Divine6.1 Faith and Works: an Unhappy Couple?6.2 Faith in Christ versus Faithfulness of Christ and the Key Discourse of Imitation6.3 Character Formation and Philosophical Imitation: Ethical Usage of Pistis in Graeco-Roman Discourses6.4 The Mimetic Chain of Faith and Faithfulness in Paul’s Letters6.5 ConclusionPart 3: A Pistis Society7 Pistis, Charis, and Dynamis: Faith as Transjuridical and Transethnic Bond of Trust7.1 On the Crossroads of Faith and Grace, Imperialism and Benefaction, and Old and New Perspectives7.2 Pauline Faith and Grace as Responses to Graeco-Roman Imperialism and Benefaction7.3 A Religious, Bridging, Asymmetrical, Reciprocal, Universal, and Interior Virtue: Public Usage of Pistis in Graeco-Roman Discourses7.4 The Proclamation of a Transjuridical and Transethnic Bond of Trust in Paul’s Letters7.5 Conclusion8 Pistoi, Hagioi, and Apistoi: Faith as Philosophical-Religious Group Identity8.1 How to Make More Semantic Sense of the Reverse of Pistis8.2 Denouncing All Outsiders or Criticizing Particular Antagonists? Us-Versus-Them Thinking by Pagans and Paul8.3 Identifying the Faithless: Social-Religious Usage of Pistis in Graeco-Roman Discourses8.4 Apistia as a Polyvalent and Deviantizing Boundary Marker in Paul’s Letters8.5 Conclusion9 Concluding Reflections: Paul beyond the Philosophers’ Faith9.1 The Distinctiveness of Paul’s Contribution to Discourses of Pistis9.2 A Pauline Response to Present-Day Discourses of FaithBibliographyIndex