Terrorism and the measures needed to prevent terrorist attacks pose a central policy challenge for the U.S. To meet this unprecedented challenge, the U.S. has great technological assets. What is needed are mechanisms to help the government draw on these strengths in a timely and effective fashion. To do so, the government needs to reach out to university researchers, national laboratories, small, high-tech businesses and leading corporations. One of the most effective ways to do this is through public-private partnerships. To link the lessons of the National Academies study on a /Government-Industry Partnershipsa to this critical national interest, the Academy organized a conference to bring the lessons of its analysis to bear on the war on terror. By encouraging policy attention to examples of effective public-private partnerships (in particular, the need for clear goals and regular assessments), this report contributes to a better understanding of the potential partnerships to bring new security-enhancing technologies and equipment to the market in a cost-effective and timely manner.
Charles W. Wessner, Committee on Government-Industry Partnerships for the Development of New Technologies, National Research Council
1 Front Matter; 2 I. Introduction; 3 II. Proceedings: Welcome and Introduction; 4 Panel I: Partnering to Meet the New Security Challenge; 5 Panel II: Best Practice Examples of Public-Private Partnerships; 6 Panel III: Partnerships Against Bioterrorism; 7 Panel IV: Partnering for National Security; 8 Panel V: Roundtable on Partnering for National Missions: Defense, Health and Energy 109; 9 Closing Remarks; 10 Appendix A: Biographies of Speakers; 11 Appendix B: Participants List; 12 Appendix C: Bibliography
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Life Sciences, Committee on Metagenomics: Challenges and Functional Applications
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Institute of Medicine, and Families Board on Children, Youth, Steve Olson
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, Committee on Animal Nutrition, Subcommittee on Dog and Cat Nutrition
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, Committee on Nutrient Requirements of Horses
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, and Statistical Sciences Committee on AIDS Research and the Behavioral, Social, Lincoln E. Moses, Heather G. Miller, Charles F. Turner
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems, Division of Natural Hazard Mitigation, Committee on Natural Disasters
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems, Division of Natural Hazard Mitigation, Committee on Natural Disasters
National Research Council, Policy and Global Affairs, and Economic Policy Board on Science, Technology, Committee on Measuring and Sustaining the New Economy, Charles W. Wessner, Dale W. Jorgenson
National Research Council, Policy and Global Affairs, and Economic Policy Board on Science, Technology, Committee on Competing in the 21st Century: Best Practice in State and Regional Innovation Initiatives, Charles W. Wessner
National Research Council, Policy and Global Affairs, and Economic Policy Board on Science, Technology, Committee on Comparative National Innovation Policies: Best Practice for the 21st Century, Alan Wm. Wolff, Charles W. Wessner
National Research Council, Policy and Global Affairs, and Economic Policy Board on Science, Technology, Committee on Competing in the 21st Century: Best Practice in State and Regional Innovation Initiatives, Charles W. Wessner
National Research Council, Policy and Global Affairs, and Economic Policy Board on Science, Technology, Committee on Competing in the 21st Century: Best Practice in State and Regional Innovation Initiatives, Charles W. Wessner
National Research Council, Policy and Global Affairs, and Economic Policy Board on Science, Technology, Committee on Comparative Innovation Policy: Best Practice for the 21st Century, Charles W. Wessner
National Research Council, Policy and Global Affairs, and Economic Policy Board on Science, Technology, Committee on Comparative Innovation Policy: Best Practice for the 21st Century, Charles W. Wessner