Nuremberg Principles and Ukraine

Herbert R. Reginbogin is a Collegiate law fellow at the Catholic University of America Institute for Policy Research and professor of international relations and international law.Marshall J. Breger is professor of Law at the Columbus School of Law, The Catholic University of America.

• List of Tables and FiguresAcknowledgmentsForeword by Christoph SafferlingForeword by Eli RosenbaumIntroductionHerbert Reginbogin and Marshall BregerPart One: The Historical and Legal National Perspectives of the Crime of Aggression at the International Military Tribunal (IMT) at Nuremberg, 1945-1946Chapter 1The Soviet Role in the Nuremberg Trials and Why It Matters TodayFrancine HirschChapter 2The British PerspectiveToby SimpsonChapter 3The French PerspectiveHerve AscensioChapter 4The German PerspectiveStafanie BockChapter 5The American PerspectiveMichael Bazyler and Aubrey ButlerPart Two: The Nuremberg Principles: Trial of the Doctors and Judges’- Reflections on Medical Ethics the Rule of Law, 1946 -1947Chapter 6Thanatology and the Nuremberg Doctors’ Trial: Conceptualizing the ‘Science of Killing’Ulf SchmidtChapter 7The Judges Trials: The Lawlessness of the Rule of LawChristoph SafferlingPart 3: The Legacy of Nuremberg Principles Ad-Hoc TribunalsChapter 8Locating Legitimacy in the Structural Design of International and Internationalized Criminal TribunalsMichael KellyChapter 9The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda and Its Controversial LegacyGerd HankelChapter 10The Nuremberg Legacy in East Timor, Indonesia, and CambodiaDavid CohenPart 4: Nuremberg Law Principles and Contemporary Challenges: Continuity or Change?Chapter 11The USA and International Criminal Law After 80 Years: Continuity or Change from Victor’s Justice to the Rule of LawHerbert R. ReginboginChapter 12Crime of Aggression and Other Core CrimesLawrence DouglasPart 5: Implementing the Nuremberg Principles in the Contemporary Context of the Criminalization of War Crimes and Current International Humanitarian Codes of WarChapter 13The Nuremberg Principles and Constraints on Armed Conflict: Change and Continuity in the Effort to Limit Warfare in World HistoryMichael BryantChapter 14The Unlawful Transfer and Deportation of ChildrenNoelle QuénivetChapter 15A Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine Beyond the Nuremberg Principles?Vaios KoutroulisPart 6: The Nuremberg Principles: Theology – Philosophy- ReconciliationChapter 16Meditation on Truth, Memory, Justice, and DeterrenceMarshall BregerChapter 17The Just and the Unjust, the Russian War on Ukraine: A Theological Perspective of Law and MoralityMark MorozowichChapter 18Russia’s Holy War: Ukraine and the Orthodox ChurchesYuri StoyanovPart 7: Ukraine’s Nuremberg – War Crime IssuesChapter 19The Genocide Convention and the Russia-Ukraine WarKristina HookChapter 20Seeking Accountability for International Crimes Committed in Russia’s War of Aggression against Ukraine: Domestically, before the ICC and in Third StatesIsabelle HassfurtherChapter 21Sanctions through the private sector: Investment Arbitration as a Legal Mechanism Under the REPO ActEric ChangChapter 22The Destruction of Ukrainian Cultural HeritageAnton Korynevych, Tymur Korotkyi, and Nataliia HendelChapter 23Russia’s War of Aggression against Ukraine and the Crime of AggressionClaus KressChapter 24Evidence Collection for War Crimes in UkraineOleksandra MatviichukPart 8: ReflectionsChapter 25The Nuremberg Principles: A Unique Legal InheritanceViviane E. Dittrich and Kiran MenonChapter 26How the Ukraine Situation Is Testing the International Criminal CourtLeila Sadat and Jack HuesemanChapter 27From Nuremberg to Kyiv: Four Puzzles of Aggression and AccountabilityDavid LubanConcluding RemarksBeyond the Past Lessons and Visions of Nuremberg Principles: Providing Peace, Security, and Justice for Ukraine and the World in the 21st CenturyHerbert Reginbogin and Marshall BregerAbout the Editors and Contributors