Máiréad Enright is a Senior Lecturer at Birmingham Law School.Julie McCandless is Assistant Professor at the Law Department of the London School of Economics and Political Science.Aoife O'Donoghue is a Senior Lecturer at Durham Law School.

• PART I: INTRODUCTION1. Introduction: Troubling Judgment Julie McCandless, Máiréad Enright and Aoife O’Donoghue2. ‘Involuntary Patriotism’: Judgment, Women and National Identity on the Island of Ireland Máiréad Enright3. Doing Feminist Judgments Mary Shine Thompson4. Judging and the Judgment Writing Process: A Northern/Irish PerspectiveAoife O’DonoghuePART II: MOTHERING SUBJECTS5. McGee v Attorney GeneralCommentary: Emilie Cloatre and Máiréad Enright Judgment: Máiréad Enright 6. Flynn v PowerCommentary: Deirdre McGowan Judgment: Eoin Daly 7. MhicMhathúna v Attorney GeneralCommentary: Colm O’Cinnéide Judgment: Liam Thornton 8. Matrimonial Homes BillCommentary: Louise Crowley Judgment: Lucy-Ann Buckley 9. National and Provincial Building Society v LyndCommentary: David Capper Judgment: Lorna Fox O’Mahony 10. The Report of the Tribunal of Inquiry into the ‘Kerry Babies Case’Commentary: Yvonne Marie Daly Judgment: Vicky Conway PART III: OTHERED SUBJECTS11. McGimpsey v IrelandCommentary: Ruth Alice Houghton Judgment: Aoife O’Donoghue 12. In Re WhiteCommentary: Carmel Roulston Judgment: Catherine O’Rourke 13. Lobe v Minister for Justice, Equality and Law ReformCommentary: Hilkka Becker Judgment: Siobhán Mullally and Cliodhna Murphy 14. Zappone and Gilligan v The Revenue Commissioners, Ireland and the Attorney GeneralCommentary: Siobhán Wills and Máiréad Enright Judgment: Fiona de Londras 15. In Re E (a child) (the ‘Holy Cross’ case)Commentary: Christine Bell FBA Judgment: Colin Murray 16. O’Keeffe v HickeyCommentary: Laura Hilly Judgment: Maeve O’Rourke 17. Christian Brothers High School Clonmel v Mary Stokes and the Equality AuthorityCommentary: Claire Bruton Judgment: Olivia Smith PART IV: CHOOSING SUBJECTS18. Attorney General v XCommentary: Sheelagh McGuinness Judgment: Ruth Fletcher 19. North Western Health Board v HW and CW (the PKU case)Commentary: Donal Coffey Judgment: Maebh Harding 20. PM v The Board of Management of St Vincent’s Hospital andJustin Geoghegan and the Attorney GeneralCommentary: Claire Murray Judgment: Mary Donnelly 21. Re Family Planning Association of Northern Ireland v The Minister for Health, Social Services and Public SafetyCommentary: Sara Ramshaw Judgment: Kathryn McNeilly 22. Society for the Protection of Unborn Children’s Application for Judicial ReviewCommentary: John Kennedy Judgment: Claire McCann PART V: EMBODIED SUBJECTS23. DPP v TiernanCommentary: Liz Campbell Judgment: Louise Kennefi ck and Caroline Fennell 24. McKinley v Minister for DefenceCommentary: Fergus Ryan Judgment: Joanne Conaghan 25. BJM v CMCommentary: Christine Ryan Judgment: Aideen Ryan and Katie Dawson 26. DPP v CCommentary: Anna Arstein-Kerslake Judgment: Eilionóir Flynn and Sinéad Ring 27. CC v IrelandCommentary: Cian Ó Concubhair Judgment: David Prendergast 28. Foy v Ant-Ard ChláraitheoirCommentary: Ivana Bacik Judgment: Tanya Ní Mhuirthile 29. Barnes v Belfast City CouncilCommentary: Fiona Cooke Judgment: Marie Fox30. A and B (by C) v A (Health and Social Services Trust)Commentary: Marian Duggan Judgment: Julie McCandless

The need for such a work is apparent: women have been under-represented in Irish courts before and after independence, meaning that their voices have been absent. The depth of research that went into this work is admirable and gives it credibility...This book is wonderfully insightful and is an essential and highly recommended companion reader to one-sided cases which do not truly do justice.

Máiréad Enright is a Senior Lecturer at Birmingham Law School.Julie McCandless is Assistant Professor at the Law Department of the London School of Economics and Political Science.Aoife O'Donoghue is a Senior Lecturer at Durham Law School.

• PART I: INTRODUCTION1. Introduction: Troubling Judgment Julie McCandless, Máiréad Enright and Aoife O’Donoghue2. ‘Involuntary Patriotism’: Judgment, Women and National Identity on the Island of Ireland Máiréad Enright3. Doing Feminist Judgments Mary Shine Thompson4. Judging and the Judgment Writing Process: A Northern/Irish PerspectiveAoife O’DonoghuePART II: MOTHERING SUBJECTS5. McGee v Attorney GeneralCommentary: Emilie Cloatre and Máiréad Enright Judgment: Máiréad Enright 6. Flynn v PowerCommentary: Deirdre McGowan Judgment: Eoin Daly 7. MhicMhathúna v Attorney GeneralCommentary: Colm O’Cinnéide Judgment: Liam Thornton 8. Matrimonial Homes BillCommentary: Louise Crowley Judgment: Lucy-Ann Buckley 9. National and Provincial Building Society v LyndCommentary: David Capper Judgment: Lorna Fox O’Mahony 10. The Report of the Tribunal of Inquiry into the ‘Kerry Babies Case’Commentary: Yvonne Marie Daly Judgment: Vicky Conway PART III: OTHERED SUBJECTS11. McGimpsey v IrelandCommentary: Ruth Alice Houghton Judgment: Aoife O’Donoghue 12. In Re WhiteCommentary: Carmel Roulston Judgment: Catherine O’Rourke 13. Lobe v Minister for Justice, Equality and Law ReformCommentary: Hilkka Becker Judgment: Siobhán Mullally and Cliodhna Murphy 14. Zappone and Gilligan v The Revenue Commissioners, Ireland and the Attorney GeneralCommentary: Siobhán Wills and Máiréad Enright Judgment: Fiona de Londras 15. In Re E (a child) (the ‘Holy Cross’ case)Commentary: Christine Bell FBA Judgment: Colin Murray 16. O’Keeffe v HickeyCommentary: Laura Hilly Judgment: Maeve O’Rourke 17. Christian Brothers High School Clonmel v Mary Stokes and the Equality AuthorityCommentary: Claire Bruton Judgment: Olivia Smith PART IV: CHOOSING SUBJECTS18. Attorney General v XCommentary: Sheelagh McGuinness Judgment: Ruth Fletcher 19. North Western Health Board v HW and CW (the PKU case)Commentary: Donal Coffey Judgment: Maebh Harding 20. PM v The Board of Management of St Vincent’s Hospital andJustin Geoghegan and the Attorney GeneralCommentary: Claire Murray Judgment: Mary Donnelly 21. Re Family Planning Association of Northern Ireland v The Minister for Health, Social Services and Public SafetyCommentary: Sara Ramshaw Judgment: Kathryn McNeilly 22. Society for the Protection of Unborn Children’s Application for Judicial ReviewCommentary: John Kennedy Judgment: Claire McCann PART V: EMBODIED SUBJECTS23. DPP v TiernanCommentary: Liz Campbell Judgment: Louise Kennefi ck and Caroline Fennell 24. McKinley v Minister for DefenceCommentary: Fergus Ryan Judgment: Joanne Conaghan 25. BJM v CMCommentary: Christine Ryan Judgment: Aideen Ryan and Katie Dawson 26. DPP v CCommentary: Anna Arstein-Kerslake Judgment: Eilionóir Flynn and Sinéad Ring 27. CC v IrelandCommentary: Cian Ó Concubhair Judgment: David Prendergast 28. Foy v Ant-Ard ChláraitheoirCommentary: Ivana Bacik Judgment: Tanya Ní Mhuirthile 29. Barnes v Belfast City CouncilCommentary: Fiona Cooke Judgment: Marie Fox30. A and B (by C) v A (Health and Social Services Trust)Commentary: Marian Duggan Judgment: Julie McCandless

The need for such a work is apparent: women have been under-represented in Irish courts before and after independence, meaning that their voices have been absent. The depth of research that went into this work is admirable and gives it credibility...This book is wonderfully insightful and is an essential and highly recommended companion reader to one-sided cases which do not truly do justice.

Máiréad Enright is a Senior Lecturer at Birmingham Law School.Julie McCandless is Assistant Professor at the Law Department of the London School of Economics and Political Science.Aoife O'Donoghue is a Senior Lecturer at Durham Law School.

• PART I: INTRODUCTION1. Introduction: Troubling Judgment Julie McCandless, Máiréad Enright and Aoife O’Donoghue2. ‘Involuntary Patriotism’: Judgment, Women and National Identity on the Island of Ireland Máiréad Enright3. Doing Feminist Judgments Mary Shine Thompson4. Judging and the Judgment Writing Process: A Northern/Irish PerspectiveAoife O’DonoghuePART II: MOTHERING SUBJECTS5. McGee v Attorney GeneralCommentary: Emilie Cloatre and Máiréad Enright Judgment: Máiréad Enright 6. Flynn v PowerCommentary: Deirdre McGowan Judgment: Eoin Daly 7. MhicMhathúna v Attorney GeneralCommentary: Colm O’Cinnéide Judgment: Liam Thornton 8. Matrimonial Homes BillCommentary: Louise Crowley Judgment: Lucy-Ann Buckley 9. National and Provincial Building Society v LyndCommentary: David Capper Judgment: Lorna Fox O’Mahony 10. The Report of the Tribunal of Inquiry into the ‘Kerry Babies Case’Commentary: Yvonne Marie Daly Judgment: Vicky Conway PART III: OTHERED SUBJECTS11. McGimpsey v IrelandCommentary: Ruth Alice Houghton Judgment: Aoife O’Donoghue 12. In Re WhiteCommentary: Carmel Roulston Judgment: Catherine O’Rourke 13. Lobe v Minister for Justice, Equality and Law ReformCommentary: Hilkka Becker Judgment: Siobhán Mullally and Cliodhna Murphy 14. Zappone and Gilligan v The Revenue Commissioners, Ireland and the Attorney GeneralCommentary: Siobhán Wills and Máiréad Enright Judgment: Fiona de Londras 15. In Re E (a child) (the ‘Holy Cross’ case)Commentary: Christine Bell FBA Judgment: Colin Murray 16. O’Keeffe v HickeyCommentary: Laura Hilly Judgment: Maeve O’Rourke 17. Christian Brothers High School Clonmel v Mary Stokes and the Equality AuthorityCommentary: Claire Bruton Judgment: Olivia Smith PART IV: CHOOSING SUBJECTS18. Attorney General v XCommentary: Sheelagh McGuinness Judgment: Ruth Fletcher 19. North Western Health Board v HW and CW (the PKU case)Commentary: Donal Coffey Judgment: Maebh Harding 20. PM v The Board of Management of St Vincent’s Hospital andJustin Geoghegan and the Attorney GeneralCommentary: Claire Murray Judgment: Mary Donnelly 21. Re Family Planning Association of Northern Ireland v The Minister for Health, Social Services and Public SafetyCommentary: Sara Ramshaw Judgment: Kathryn McNeilly 22. Society for the Protection of Unborn Children’s Application for Judicial ReviewCommentary: John Kennedy Judgment: Claire McCann PART V: EMBODIED SUBJECTS23. DPP v TiernanCommentary: Liz Campbell Judgment: Louise Kennefi ck and Caroline Fennell 24. McKinley v Minister for DefenceCommentary: Fergus Ryan Judgment: Joanne Conaghan 25. BJM v CMCommentary: Christine Ryan Judgment: Aideen Ryan and Katie Dawson 26. DPP v CCommentary: Anna Arstein-Kerslake Judgment: Eilionóir Flynn and Sinéad Ring 27. CC v IrelandCommentary: Cian Ó Concubhair Judgment: David Prendergast 28. Foy v Ant-Ard ChláraitheoirCommentary: Ivana Bacik Judgment: Tanya Ní Mhuirthile 29. Barnes v Belfast City CouncilCommentary: Fiona Cooke Judgment: Marie Fox30. A and B (by C) v A (Health and Social Services Trust)Commentary: Marian Duggan Judgment: Julie McCandless

The need for such a work is apparent: women have been under-represented in Irish courts before and after independence, meaning that their voices have been absent. The depth of research that went into this work is admirable and gives it credibility...This book is wonderfully insightful and is an essential and highly recommended companion reader to one-sided cases which do not truly do justice.