New Directions in Sport History

Duncan Stone recently completed his Ph.D. at the University of Huddersfield, UK. His main research interests include amateurism, regionalism, the role of urban/suburbanisation upon social and cultural identities, the ‘cultural war’ over the definition of sporting practice, and the legitimate function and meaning of sporting activity.John Hughson is Professor of Sport and Cultural Studies at the University of Central Lancashire, UK. He is the Director of the International Football Institute, and works in research partnership with the National Football Museum, Manchester, UK. He is author of The Making of Sporting Cultures (Routledge, 2009) and The Uses of Sport (Routledge, 2005).Rob Ellis is Lecturer in History at the University of Huddersfield, UK. He has published articles on the West Riding Pauper Asylum’s relationship with the Poor Law. More recently, he has worked with West Yorkshire Archive Service, the Thackery Medical Museum, Leeds City museums and South West Yorkshire Mental Health Trust to bring the asylum story to a wider audience.

• 1. Introduction 2. Last Man Picked: Do Mainstream Historians Need to Play with Sports Historians? 3. Sports History: Outside of the Mainstream? A Response to Ward’s ‘Last Man Picked’ 4. Cracks in the (Self-Constructed?) Ghetto Walls? Comments on Paul Ward's ‘Last Man Picked’ 5. ‘The Postmodernist Always Rings Twice: Reflections on the "New" Cultural Turn in Sports History’ 6. The Sporting Image: A Personal Journey Utilising History to Develop Academic Inquiry and Creativity 7. ‘Ordinary working men … transformed into giants on the rugby field’: ‘Collective’ and ‘Individual’ Memory in Oral Histories of Rugby League 8. Asylums and Sport: Participation, Isolation and the Role of Cricket in the Treatment of the Insane 9. What's the Point of Sports History?

"New Directions in Sport Historyoffers a critical assessment of the field and provides advice on how sport historians can better relate to main stream historians, other academic audiences, and undergraduate students. Such prescriptions should be heeded; otherwise, the future of sport history is bleak and the state of the field moot. For as Johnes concludes, arguing over the relationship between subdisciplines or whether we have studied X or Y enough will be redundant because none of us will have jobs to do any research in the first place (p. 107)."-Lindsay Parks Pieper, Sport in American History