Logic of Consent

Peter Westen is Professor of Law at the University of Michigan Law School, USA.

• Contents: Introduction. Factual Consent: Introduction; A core conception of consent: an attitude of factual acquiescence; An expression of factual acquiescence. Legal Consent: Introduction; Offenses to which consent is a defense; Prescriptive consent: an attitude or an expression?; Prescriptive attitudinal consent; Non-contemporaneous prescriptive consent; Imputed consent. The Consequences of Conceptual Complexity: Introduction; The confusions of consent; Conclusion; Bibliography, Index of cases; Index.

'Peter Westen has taken on one of the most difficult conceptual and practical problems in the law: If consent can change a prohibited act into a permitted one, what is consent's nature, how is consent manifested, and what conditions make its legal effectiveness possible and impossible? Anyone who is interested in the many issues to which consent is relevant, and particularly the law of rape, should read this extremely well argued, comprehensive, and readable book.' Professor Larry Alexander, University of San Diego School of Law, USA 'Peter Westen provides an admirably thorough and careful analysis of the different things that "consent" can mean, both within and outside the law - an analysis that is interesting in its own right, but also crucial if we are to avoid the confusions into which, as he shows, courts and theorists have so often fallen, and reach a better understanding of what "consent" should mean in the different legal contexts in which it matters.' Professor Antony Duff, University of Stirling, UK 'The Logic of Consent is both substantively and stylistically a welcome addition...postgraduate students in law, society and gender studies, as well as law professors and pracatitioners, will find The Logic of Consent an excellent source for discussion.' The Law and Politics Book Review 'Peter Westen's The Logic of Consent is nothing short of a tour de force...a sumptuous read, its pages brimming with lively cases, colorful examples, and crisp analytic moves that reveal entrenched doctinal confusions. One finishes it with a sense of breathlessness, as though one has finally come to a halt after the professional analogue of an arduous hike through tremendously interesting terrain. I recommend this hike to all who enjoy rigorous intellectual workouts in areas fraught with conceptual obstacles and rich in normative and doctinal significance.' Michigan Law Review