"Landesman has no announced interest in God, theology, or grand metaphysical designs in Leibniz's Mill, but is very interested in the philosophy of mind and its relation to science generally. He believes that a clear dualism between mind and body is not only preferable to materialism, but is quite compatible with modern science, which he believes is less precise and authoritative when presupposing materialistic presuppositions." —Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies"Landesman's recovery of early modern philosophical insights is not only methodological, but also substantive; his conclusion regarding materialism is that is does not stand up to fair and rigorous philosophical reflection for reasons that were quite apparent to the great philosophers of the seventeenth century, primarily Descartes, Leibniz, and Locke." —American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly"Throughout this volume, Landesman argues against a philosophical/scientific model of materialistic reduction wherein physical aspects control mental activity. . . . While the book makes connections to thinkers ranging from the ancient Greeks to contemporary neurophilosophers, the text remains readable and engaging throughout." —Choice"While philosophers at times have supposed that certain questions had been settled once for all, it turns out that the supposedly doomed alternative views reappear in new versions and with new rationales. 'The life of philosophy consists not of frequent funerals for dead theories, but of happy celebrations of recoveries from illness.' In the light of this, we can understand how Landesman's book constitutes a challenge to materialism. It does this, not by offering conclusive refutations or conclusive proofs, but by presenting a coherent, well-developed view that represents a viable alternative to the prevailing materialism. So regarded, his effort must be judged a success." —Philosophical Reviews"Charles Landesman writes effortlessly, conveying to readers a rich alternative to today's mainline forms of materialism. This is a book that is comparable to Richard Rorty's Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature or Roderick M. Chisholm's Person and Object: A Metaphysical Study. Like the former, it is historical and substantial, like the latter it is unapologetic in advancing with clear arguments an under-represented position." —Charles Taliaferro, St. Olaf College