Hendrik Kaptein is Senior Lecturer in Jurisprudence, Faculteit der Rechtsgeleerdheid van de Universiteit Leiden. He has published extensively in both English and Dutch. Henry Prakken is lecturer in artificial intelligence at the Department of Information and Computing Sciences of Utrecht University and Professor of Law and ICT at the Faculty of Law, University of Groningen. His main research interests concern artificial Intelligence and law, logical foundations of common-sense reasoning and the application of argumentation in procedures for dispute resolution, group decision making and negotiation. He has published widely on these and related areas. Bart Verheij is a university lecturer/researcher (in Dutch: universitair docent) at the Artificial Intelligence department of the University of Groningen, the Netherlands. His research has focused on defeasible argumentation, legal argumentation, argumentation support software and argumentation schemes, often using formalism as a tool of analysis. Bart Verheij is a university lecturer in the Department of Artificial Intelligence, University of Groningen. His research has focused on defeasible argumentation, legal argumentation, argumentation support software and argumentation schemes, often using formalism as a tool of analysis.

• Series Editor’s Preface, List of Figures, List of Tables, Preface, General Introduction, 1 Burdens of Evidence and Proof: Why Bear Them? A Plea for Principled Opportunism in (Leaving) Legal Fact-finding (Alone), 2 The Fabrication of Facts: The Lure of the Incredible Coincidence, 3 Decision-making in the Forensic Arena, 4 Analysing Stories Using Schemes, 5 The Evaluation of Evidence: Differences between Legal Systems, 6 Inference to the Best Legal Explanation, 7 Accepting the Truth of a Story about the Facts of a Criminal Case, 8 Rigid Anarchic Principles of Evidence and Proof: Anomist Panaceas against Legal Pathologies of Proceduralism, 9 A Logical Analysis of Burdens of Proof, 10 Twelve Angry Men or One Good Woman? A symmetric Relations in Evidentiary Reasoning, Index

'Those who know little about criminal evidence should read this book. Those who think they are knowledgeable about it also. And all those in between. None of them will ever again sleep the restful sleep that it is easy to prove that somebody committed a crime.' Peter J. van Koppen, Maastricht University and Free University Amsterdam, The Netherlands 'The Netherlands has a strong tradition of exploring theoretical issues relating to argumentation, narrative, statistics, evidence, the logic of proof and their interactions in legal contexts. This challenging volume builds on and extends this tradition. It engages critically with the Anglo-American literature across the common law/civil divide.' William Twining, University College London, UK 'With some very relevant and interesting chapters it is an essential read for those wishing to understand in more detail the interactions that take place in criminal trials between the various aspects of the legal system.' The Cambrian Law Review 'This book is perfect for anyone interested in legal proof and evidence, whether a specialist or not, to get an introduction to the state-of-the-art, and a survey of the latest work on fundamental subjects like burden of proof and analysis of stories using argumentation schemes. All of the papers are illustrated with interesting cases...[and] are clearly written in a way that makes them highly accessible to and interesting to an interdisciplinary readership.' Artificial Intelligence and Law

Hendrik Kaptein is Senior Lecturer in Jurisprudence, Faculteit der Rechtsgeleerdheid van de Universiteit Leiden. He has published extensively in both English and Dutch. Henry Prakken is lecturer in artificial intelligence at the Department of Information and Computing Sciences of Utrecht University and Professor of Law and ICT at the Faculty of Law, University of Groningen. His main research interests concern artificial Intelligence and law, logical foundations of common-sense reasoning and the application of argumentation in procedures for dispute resolution, group decision making and negotiation. He has published widely on these and related areas. Bart Verheij is a university lecturer/researcher (in Dutch: universitair docent) at the Artificial Intelligence department of the University of Groningen, the Netherlands. His research has focused on defeasible argumentation, legal argumentation, argumentation support software and argumentation schemes, often using formalism as a tool of analysis. Bart Verheij is a university lecturer in the Department of Artificial Intelligence, University of Groningen. His research has focused on defeasible argumentation, legal argumentation, argumentation support software and argumentation schemes, often using formalism as a tool of analysis.

• Series Editor’s Preface, List of Figures, List of Tables, Preface, General Introduction, 1 Burdens of Evidence and Proof: Why Bear Them? A Plea for Principled Opportunism in (Leaving) Legal Fact-finding (Alone), 2 The Fabrication of Facts: The Lure of the Incredible Coincidence, 3 Decision-making in the Forensic Arena, 4 Analysing Stories Using Schemes, 5 The Evaluation of Evidence: Differences between Legal Systems, 6 Inference to the Best Legal Explanation, 7 Accepting the Truth of a Story about the Facts of a Criminal Case, 8 Rigid Anarchic Principles of Evidence and Proof: Anomist Panaceas against Legal Pathologies of Proceduralism, 9 A Logical Analysis of Burdens of Proof, 10 Twelve Angry Men or One Good Woman? A symmetric Relations in Evidentiary Reasoning, Index

'Those who know little about criminal evidence should read this book. Those who think they are knowledgeable about it also. And all those in between. None of them will ever again sleep the restful sleep that it is easy to prove that somebody committed a crime.' Peter J. van Koppen, Maastricht University and Free University Amsterdam, The Netherlands 'The Netherlands has a strong tradition of exploring theoretical issues relating to argumentation, narrative, statistics, evidence, the logic of proof and their interactions in legal contexts. This challenging volume builds on and extends this tradition. It engages critically with the Anglo-American literature across the common law/civil divide.' William Twining, University College London, UK 'With some very relevant and interesting chapters it is an essential read for those wishing to understand in more detail the interactions that take place in criminal trials between the various aspects of the legal system.' The Cambrian Law Review 'This book is perfect for anyone interested in legal proof and evidence, whether a specialist or not, to get an introduction to the state-of-the-art, and a survey of the latest work on fundamental subjects like burden of proof and analysis of stories using argumentation schemes. All of the papers are illustrated with interesting cases...[and] are clearly written in a way that makes them highly accessible to and interesting to an interdisciplinary readership.' Artificial Intelligence and Law

Hendrik Kaptein is Senior Lecturer in Jurisprudence, Faculteit der Rechtsgeleerdheid van de Universiteit Leiden. He has published extensively in both English and Dutch. Henry Prakken is lecturer in artificial intelligence at the Department of Information and Computing Sciences of Utrecht University and Professor of Law and ICT at the Faculty of Law, University of Groningen. His main research interests concern artificial Intelligence and law, logical foundations of common-sense reasoning and the application of argumentation in procedures for dispute resolution, group decision making and negotiation. He has published widely on these and related areas. Bart Verheij is a university lecturer/researcher (in Dutch: universitair docent) at the Artificial Intelligence department of the University of Groningen, the Netherlands. His research has focused on defeasible argumentation, legal argumentation, argumentation support software and argumentation schemes, often using formalism as a tool of analysis. Bart Verheij is a university lecturer in the Department of Artificial Intelligence, University of Groningen. His research has focused on defeasible argumentation, legal argumentation, argumentation support software and argumentation schemes, often using formalism as a tool of analysis.

• Series Editor’s Preface, List of Figures, List of Tables, Preface, General Introduction, 1 Burdens of Evidence and Proof: Why Bear Them? A Plea for Principled Opportunism in (Leaving) Legal Fact-finding (Alone), 2 The Fabrication of Facts: The Lure of the Incredible Coincidence, 3 Decision-making in the Forensic Arena, 4 Analysing Stories Using Schemes, 5 The Evaluation of Evidence: Differences between Legal Systems, 6 Inference to the Best Legal Explanation, 7 Accepting the Truth of a Story about the Facts of a Criminal Case, 8 Rigid Anarchic Principles of Evidence and Proof: Anomist Panaceas against Legal Pathologies of Proceduralism, 9 A Logical Analysis of Burdens of Proof, 10 Twelve Angry Men or One Good Woman? A symmetric Relations in Evidentiary Reasoning, Index

'Those who know little about criminal evidence should read this book. Those who think they are knowledgeable about it also. And all those in between. None of them will ever again sleep the restful sleep that it is easy to prove that somebody committed a crime.' Peter J. van Koppen, Maastricht University and Free University Amsterdam, The Netherlands 'The Netherlands has a strong tradition of exploring theoretical issues relating to argumentation, narrative, statistics, evidence, the logic of proof and their interactions in legal contexts. This challenging volume builds on and extends this tradition. It engages critically with the Anglo-American literature across the common law/civil divide.' William Twining, University College London, UK 'With some very relevant and interesting chapters it is an essential read for those wishing to understand in more detail the interactions that take place in criminal trials between the various aspects of the legal system.' The Cambrian Law Review 'This book is perfect for anyone interested in legal proof and evidence, whether a specialist or not, to get an introduction to the state-of-the-art, and a survey of the latest work on fundamental subjects like burden of proof and analysis of stories using argumentation schemes. All of the papers are illustrated with interesting cases...[and] are clearly written in a way that makes them highly accessible to and interesting to an interdisciplinary readership.' Artificial Intelligence and Law