Leaving without Losing

The War on Terror after Iraq and Afghanistan

Häftad, Engelska, 2013

AvMark N. Katz

419 kr

Beställningsvara. Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar. Fri frakt för medlemmar vid köp för minst 249 kr.

Finns i fler format (1)

Inbunden

339 kr

Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar

As the United States withdraws its combat troops from Iraq and Afghanistan, politicians, foreign policy specialists, and the public are worrying about the consequences of leaving these two countries. Neither nation can be considered stable, and progress toward democracy in them-a principal aim of America and the West-is fragile at best. But, international relations scholar Mark N. Katz asks: Could ending both wars actually help the United States and its allies to overcome radical Islam in the long term? Drawing lessons from the Cold War, Katz makes the case that rather than signaling the decline of American power and influence, removing military forces from Afghanistan and Iraq puts the U.S. in a better position to counter the forces of radical Islam and ultimately win the war on terror. He explains that since both wars will likely remain intractable, for Washington to remain heavily involved in either is counter-productive. Katz argues that looking to its Cold War experience would help the U.S. find better strategies for employing America's scarce resources to deal with its adversaries now.This means that, although leaving Afghanistan and Iraq may well appear to be a victory for America's opponents in the short term-as was the case when the U.S. withdrew from Indochina-the larger battle with militant Islam can be won only by refocusing foreign and military policy away from these two quagmires. This sober, objective assessment of what went wrong in the U.S.-led wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and the ways the West can disentangle itself and still move forward draws striking parallels with the Cold War. Anyone concerned with the future of the War on Terror will find Katz's argument highly thought provoking.

Produktinformation

Utgivningsdatum2013-11-10
Mått152 x 229 x 10 mm
Vikt227 g
FormatHäftad
SpråkEngelska
Antal sidor168
FörlagJohns Hopkins University Press
ISBN9781421411835

Tillhör följande kategorier

AcknowledgmentsPrologue: The Beginning of the End of the War on Terror?The War on Terror in PerspectiveThe Second Decade of the War on TerrorWhat Exactly Is the War on Terror?Understanding What Went Wrong in the First DecadeAssessing the Bush StrategyWhy Couldn't the United States Foster Democracy in Iraq?Why Couldn't the United States Foster Democracy in Afghanistan?Democratization and the Legacy of History in the Muslim WorldAssessing the Obama StrategyOpportunities after WithdrawalConsequences of Withdrawing from Iraq and AfghanistanRegional OppositionRadical RepressionRifts among the RadicalsWithdrawal Need Not Be DefeatBeyond Iraq and AfghanistanRegional and Local Conflicts in the War on TerrorThe Israeli-Palestinian ConflictIranYemenPakistanDecoupling Regional and Local Conflicts from the War on TerrorNew Factors and Broader ContextsThe Death of Osama bin LadenThe Arab SpringThe Geopolitical ContextThe Historical ContextThe Bush and Obama LegaciesWorks CitedIndex

As the U.S. searches for a way forward, Katz's largely objective and thoughtful analysis offers much to consider. Publishers Weekly A fine pick for any military or political science holding. Midwest Book Review Katz offers a strong, cogent argument. Choice A model of its kind. -- Anthony Smith New Zealand International Review This slender volume is packed with many insights. A collection of short chapters, some not much longer than op-eds, reveals author Mark Katz's wisdom and prudence when it comes to the use of military power, and the need for patience and persistence when pursuing long-term objectives... His straightforward prose engages the reader in what often feels like a quiet one-on-one conversation... The book is suffused with a tone of welcome optimism, but not naivete. -- Christopher Preble Middle East Policy A well-written and well-organized presentation of possibilities and angles that counterterrorism policy makers and analysts should consider. World Future Review