Lay Empowerment and the Development of Puritanism

Francis J. Bremer is Professor Emeritus of History at Millersville University of Pennsylvania, USA. He has been a visiting scholar at Oxford University, the University of Cambridge, and Trinity College. He has authored and edited a total of sixteen other books on puritanism in the Atlantic world, including the prize-winning John Winthrop: America's Forgotten Founding Father (2003) and Building a New Jerusalem: John Davenport, a Puritan in Three Worlds (2012).

• Contents 1. The Experience and Meaning of God's Caress 2. Thinking of the Laity in the English Reformation 3. Lay Puritans in Stuart England 4. Gatherings of the Saints in England and the Netherlands 5. Shaping the New England Way 6. The Free Grace Controversy and Redefining the Role of Lay Believers 7. The Role of the Laity in England's Puritan Revolution 8. Varieties of Lay Enthusiasm in New England and England 9. Responding to the Challenges of Diversity, 1640-1660 10. Clergy and Laity in the Later Seventeenth Century

“This is an impressive book, which synthesises a wide variety of scholarship into a highly readable tome. … This book serves as a valuable reminder that one of the biggest mistakes one can make when studying Puritanism in a local context is to view the phenomenon in isolation.” (James Mawdesley, Transactions of the Historic Society of Lancashire & Cheshire, Vol. 168, 2019)“This book’s spatial and temporal framework make it especially illuminating. Bremer is not the first historian to situate Puritanism in its transatlantic context, but he renders that context more useful by making it multidirectional.” (Shelby M. Balik, Journal of American History, Vol. 103 (1), June, 2016)“Lay Empowerment, while drawing on some primary source material, predominantly assembles existing research in a useful newframework that emphasizes how central the laity were to the development of puritanism. … the study as a whole offers a valuable account of the lay contribution to puritanism’s coherence and dynamism across its diverse manifestations.” (Kate Narveson, American Historical Review, Vol. 121 (3), June, 2016)