Charles Mitchell is Professor of Law at UCL. His recent publications include Underhill & Hayton's Law Relating to Trusts and Trustees (19th edn, 2015) (with David Hayton and Paul Matthews) and Goff and Jones: The Law of Unjust Enrichment (8th edn, 2010) (with Paul Mitchell and Stephen Watterson). Paul Mitchell is Professor of Law at UCL. His recent publications include A History of Tort Law 1900-1950 (2015) and Goff and Jones: The Law of Unjust Enrichment (8th edn, 2010) (with Charles Mitchell and Stephen Watterson). Together they have also co-edited Landmark Cases in the Law of Restitution, Landmark Cases in the Law of Tort and Landmark Cases in Equity (all from Hart Publishing).

• 1 Coggs v Barnard (1703) DAVID IBBETSON2 Pillans v Van Mierop (1765) GERARD MCMEEL3 Carter v Boehm (1766) STEPHEN WATTERSON4 Da Costa v Jones (1778) WARREN SWAIN5 Hochster v De La Tour (1853) PAUL MITCHELL6 Taylor v Caldwell (1863) CATHARINE MACMILLAN7 Smith v Hughes (1871) JOHN PHILLIPS8 Foakes v Beer (1884) MICHAEL LOBBAN9 Hongkong Fir Shipping Co v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd, The Hongkong Fir (1961) DONAL NOLAN10 Suisse Atlantique Société d'Armament SA v NV Rotterdamsche Kolen Centrale (1966) ROGER BROWNSWORD11 Reardon Smith Lines Ltd v Yngvar Hansen-Tangen, The Diana Prosperity (1976) MICHAEL BRIDGE12 Johnson v Agnew (1979) CHARLES MITCHELL

The work presents a refreshing take on the cases examined.

Charles Mitchell is Professor of Law at UCL. His recent publications include Underhill & Hayton's Law Relating to Trusts and Trustees (19th edn, 2015) (with David Hayton and Paul Matthews) and Goff and Jones: The Law of Unjust Enrichment (8th edn, 2010) (with Paul Mitchell and Stephen Watterson). Paul Mitchell is Professor of Law at UCL. His recent publications include A History of Tort Law 1900-1950 (2015) and Goff and Jones: The Law of Unjust Enrichment (8th edn, 2010) (with Charles Mitchell and Stephen Watterson). Together they have also co-edited Landmark Cases in the Law of Restitution, Landmark Cases in the Law of Tort and Landmark Cases in Equity (all from Hart Publishing).

• 1 Coggs v Barnard (1703) DAVID IBBETSON2 Pillans v Van Mierop (1765) GERARD MCMEEL3 Carter v Boehm (1766) STEPHEN WATTERSON4 Da Costa v Jones (1778) WARREN SWAIN5 Hochster v De La Tour (1853) PAUL MITCHELL6 Taylor v Caldwell (1863) CATHARINE MACMILLAN7 Smith v Hughes (1871) JOHN PHILLIPS8 Foakes v Beer (1884) MICHAEL LOBBAN9 Hongkong Fir Shipping Co v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd, The Hongkong Fir (1961) DONAL NOLAN10 Suisse Atlantique Société d'Armament SA v NV Rotterdamsche Kolen Centrale (1966) ROGER BROWNSWORD11 Reardon Smith Lines Ltd v Yngvar Hansen-Tangen, The Diana Prosperity (1976) MICHAEL BRIDGE12 Johnson v Agnew (1979) CHARLES MITCHELL

The work presents a refreshing take on the cases examined.

Charles Mitchell is Professor of Law at UCL. His recent publications include Underhill & Hayton's Law Relating to Trusts and Trustees (19th edn, 2015) (with David Hayton and Paul Matthews) and Goff and Jones: The Law of Unjust Enrichment (8th edn, 2010) (with Paul Mitchell and Stephen Watterson). Paul Mitchell is Professor of Law at UCL. His recent publications include A History of Tort Law 1900-1950 (2015) and Goff and Jones: The Law of Unjust Enrichment (8th edn, 2010) (with Charles Mitchell and Stephen Watterson). Together they have also co-edited Landmark Cases in the Law of Restitution, Landmark Cases in the Law of Tort and Landmark Cases in Equity (all from Hart Publishing).

• 1 Coggs v Barnard (1703) DAVID IBBETSON2 Pillans v Van Mierop (1765) GERARD MCMEEL3 Carter v Boehm (1766) STEPHEN WATTERSON4 Da Costa v Jones (1778) WARREN SWAIN5 Hochster v De La Tour (1853) PAUL MITCHELL6 Taylor v Caldwell (1863) CATHARINE MACMILLAN7 Smith v Hughes (1871) JOHN PHILLIPS8 Foakes v Beer (1884) MICHAEL LOBBAN9 Hongkong Fir Shipping Co v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd, The Hongkong Fir (1961) DONAL NOLAN10 Suisse Atlantique Société d'Armament SA v NV Rotterdamsche Kolen Centrale (1966) ROGER BROWNSWORD11 Reardon Smith Lines Ltd v Yngvar Hansen-Tangen, The Diana Prosperity (1976) MICHAEL BRIDGE12 Johnson v Agnew (1979) CHARLES MITCHELL

The work presents a refreshing take on the cases examined.