Del 103 i serien Polish Analytical Philosophy

Kazimierz Twardowski: A Grammar for Philosophy

Inbunden, Engelska, 2015

2 029 kr

Beställningsvara. Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar. Fri frakt för medlemmar vid köp för minst 249 kr.

Kazimierz Twardowski (1866-1938) is the founder of the Lvov-Warsaw School with its strong tradition in logic and its scientific approach to philosophy. Twardowski’s unique way of doing philosophy, his method, is of central importance for understanding his impact as a teacher. This method can be understood as a philosophical grammar, which is also how Leibniz conceived his universal language of thought.Analytic philosophy in the twentieth century can be characterized by its opposition to psychologism, on the one hand, and its opposition to metaphysics, on the other. This is changing now, as questions within the philosophy of mind and metaphysics are raised by analytic philosophers today.Maria van der Schaar shows in her book that we can improve our analytic methods by making use of Twardowski’s philosophical grammar. Twardowski’s positive attitude to psychology and metaphysics may also help us to develop an analytic metaphysics and to get a better understanding of the relation between psychology and philosophy.

Produktinformation

Utgivningsdatum2015-10-08
Mått155 x 235 x 16 mm
Vikt403 g
FormatInbunden
SpråkEngelska
SeriePolish Analytical Philosophy
Antal sidor182
FörlagBrill
ISBN9789004304024

Tillhör följande kategorier

1. Introduction. Twardowski as A Pupil and A Teacher . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92. Questions of Method. From Descriptive Psychology toPhilosophical Grammar . 161. Descriptive Psychology . 162. A Philosophical Grammar . 243. The Grammatical Distinction Between Internal and ExternalObject . 324. Modifying Terms . 353. Content and Object. From Psychology to Metaphysics . . . . . . . . . . . 501. The Distinction between Content and Object . 502. The Content of the Act . 553. The Object of the Act . 59From Psychology to Metaphysics . 59Husserl’s Reaction to Twardowski’s Account of Intentionality . 61Metaphysics and Mereology . 68General Objects . 744. Images and Concepts . 804. Judgement and Meaning. ON Actions and Products . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 841. The Historical Background of Twardowski’s Theoryof Judgement . 842. Some Conceptual Distinctions . 913. A Development in Twardowski’s Early Account of Judgement . 974. Actions and Products . 1035. Twardowski’s Critique of Russell’s Multiple Relation Theoryof Judgement . 1135. Knowing and Prejudice. An Educational Mission . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1171. Some Conceptual Distinctions . 1172. Brentano and Bolzano on Knowledge . 1193. Knowledge, Science and the Cognitive Act . 1224. Prejudice and the Critical Mind . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1266. Truth and Time. Twardowski’s Impact onhis Students . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1291. The Correspondence Definition of Truth . 1292. The Absoluteness of Truth and the Logical Principles . 1353. Determinism and the Relativity of Truth to Time . 150Truth and Time . 150Jan Łukasiewicz . 152Tadeusz Kotarbiński . 154Leśniewski’s and Twardowski’s Reaction to Kotarbiński . 157Conclusion . 160Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163Name Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 171