Stacey Moran reevaluates Karen Barad’s legacy, by showing that agential realism cannot be understood apart from the rhetorical and transdisciplinary practices through which it is articulated. Against humanities readings that celebrate Barad’s concepts while neglecting their formal construction, and against dismissals from physics that treat the work as philosophically suggestive but scientifically marginal, she argues that rhetoric is not secondary to Barad’s thought but constitutive of it.Through close readings of style, metaphor, analogy, dramatisation and other textual strategies, Moran reconceives agential realism as a project that reshapes the relations among disciplines rather than simply borrowing across them. In doing so, she repositions Barad within debates in feminist theory, science studies and foundational physics, while also advancing a broader account of transdisciplinarity as an open, iterative and transformative engagement among heterogeneous practices of knowledge.
Stacey Moran is Assistant Professor of Media and Technology Studies in the Herberger Institute for Design & the Arts and the Department of English at Arizona State University. She has published work on feminist materialism, philosophical style, disciplinary relation, and scientific discourse.
AcknowledgementsIntroduction: The Problem of Reading Karen BaradPart OneChapter 1: Hearing Silence: Rhetoric, Transdisciplinarity, and Physics in Barad’s ReceptionSilence as a Material RhetoricThe Silence of RhetoricThe Silence of TransdisciplinarityThe Silence of PhysicsThe Rhetorical Work of SilenceChapter 2: Beyond Affirmation: The Rhetorical Life of DiffractionAffirmation as Mood and MethodDiffraction Beyond AffirmationA Rhetoric of Resonance in Diffractive ReadingsThe Additive Logic of Diffractive BlurDiffraction as an Apt MetaphorPart TwoChapter 3: Dramatic Beginnings: Barad, Fiction, and the Staging of Agential RealismFrayn in the Frame: The Silence Around CopenhagenNew Materialism After Theory: Transatlantic Genealogies, Institutional Crisis, and the Return of the TextualReading Frayn and Barad: Authorial Intent, History, and Performance in CopenhagenFiction as Apparatus: Artifactuality, Diffraction, and the Emergence of Agential RealismStaging Transdisciplinarity: Why Barad’s Dramatic Beginning MattersChapter 4: Invented Schemes: Analogy, Thought Experiment, and the Making of Agential RealismBarad Rejects Analogy?Structures of AnalogyTissues of AnalogyRewriting Copenhagen: A Thought ExperimentAffects of AnalogyChapter 5: At the Threshold of Nothingness: Epigraphs, Photography, and Agential RealismEpigraphs as ThresholdsIntegral EpigraphsRogue EpigraphsFeeling the ThresholdLooking Otherwise: The Event of PhotographyChapter 6: In Lieu of a Conclusion: Toward Another TransdisciplinarityTen provocationsBibliography