Kant's Early Critics on Freedom of the Will

Jörg Noller is Lecturer in Philosophy at LMU Munich. He has published numerous books on Kant and German idealism, including The Concept of Will in Classical German Philosophy (with Manja Kisner, 2020) as well as articles in journals including the European Journal of Philosophy and Kant-Studien. John Walsh is postdoctoral researcher at Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, where he is coordinator of the 'Obligation of Societal Norms' International Graduate School. He has written several book chapters on free will and ethics in German idealism.

• Note on the Edition and Translation; List of Abbreviations; Historical and Systematic Introduction; Chronology of the Translated Texts and Kant's Major Works; Part I. Freedom and Determinism: 1. Hermann Andreas Pistorius [Review:] 'Elucidations of Professor Kant's 'Critique of Pure Reason' by Joh. Schulze, Royal Prussian Court Chaplain. Königsberg: Dengel, 1784. 8, 254 pages.' 1786; 2. Johann August Heinrich Ulrich, Eleutheriology or On Freedom and Necessity, Jena 1788; 3. Christian Wilhelm Snell, On Determinism and Moral Freedom, Offenbach, 1789; 4. August Ludwig Christian Heydenreich, On Freedom and Determinism and their Compatibility, Erlangen 1793; Part II. Freedom and Imputability: 5. Carl Christian Erhard Schmid, Lexicon for the Easier Use of the Kantian Writings, 1788 (2nd Edition); 6. Carl Christian Erhard Schmid, Attempt at a Moral Philosophy, Jena 1790; 7. Johann Christoph Schwab, 'On the Two Kinds of I, and the Concept of Freedom in Kant's Ethics' Philosophisches Archiv 1(1) (1792), 69–80; 8. Johann Christoph Schwab, 'On Intelligible Fatalism in the Critical Philosophy' Philosophisches Archiv 2(2) (1794), 26–33; 9. Karl Leonhard Reinhold, Contributions to the Correction of Previous Misunderstandings of Philosophers: Volume II Concerning the Foundation of Philosophical Knowledge, Metaphysics, Ethics, Moral Religion, and Doctrine of Taste, Jena 1794; Part III: Freedom and Consciousness; 10. Ludwig Heinrich von Jakob, 'On Freedom', Berlin 1788; 11. Karl Heinrich Heydenreich, 'On Moral Freedom' Betrachtungen über die Philosophie der natürlichen Religion, Zweiter Band, Leipzig 1791, 56–69; 12. Johann Heinrich Abicht, 'On the Freedom of the Will' Neues Philosophisches Magazin. Ed. by J.H. Abicht and F.G. Born. Leipzig 1789. Vol. 1. Part I (III), 64–85; Part IV. Freedom and Skepticism: Leonhard Creuzer, Skeptical Reflections on Freedom of the Will with Respect to the Most Recent Theories on the Same, Giessen 1793; 13.Friedrich Carl Forberg, On the Grounds and Laws of Free Actions, Jena and Leipzig, 1795; 14. Johann Gottlieb Fichte, [Review:] 'Skeptical Reflections on Freedom of the Will with Respect to the Most Recent Theories on the Same by Leonhard Creuzer, 1793' ALZ 303 (1793), col. 201–205; 15. Salomon Maimon, 'The Moral Skeptic'; 16. Berlinisches Archiv der Zeit und ihres Geschmacks Volume II (1800), pp. 271–292; Part V. Freedom and Choice: Immanuel Kant, Preliminary Notes and Reflections to the Introduction to the Metaphysics of Morals (before 1797); 17. Immanuel Kant, Introduction to the Metaphysics of Morals, 1797; 18. Karl Leonhard Reinhold, 'Some Remarks on the Concept of the Freedom of the Will, posed by I. Kant in the Introduction to the Metaphysical Foundations of the Doctrine of Right', 1797 Auswahl vermischter Schriften Volume II, Jena 1797, 364–400; 19. Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Schelling, 'General Overview of the Most Recent Philosophical Literature' Philosophisches Journal, Vol. 7/2, Jena and Leipzig, 1797, 105–186; Appendix: Biographical Sketches.

'This is a fine collection that will help students and scholars understand the intricacies of Kant's multifaceted theory of freedom. When we see how Kant's own contemporaries debated some of the same interpretive and philosophical issues that we debate today, we get insight into the enduring appeal of Kant's approach. No philosopher before or since offered an examination of freedom as complicated and yet rewarding as Kant's, and here we can see his own contemporaries clashing over what Kant meant and how we humans are or are not free.' Frederick Rauscher, Michigan State University