Judging on a Collegial Court

Influences on Federal Appellate Decision Making

Häftad, Engelska, 2007

Av Virginia A. Hettinger, Stefanie A. Lindquist, Wendy L. Martinek

279 kr

Tillfälligt slut

Dissensus is often viewed in the professional world as a starting point for collaboration; rather than leaving decisions to just one person, dissent offers the opportunity to rethink or reinvent an idea, leading, one hopes, to a better result. When dissensus occurs in a federal court, however, it raises the question of whether this difference of opinion maintains the integrity of the judiciary or undermines its legitimacy. In ""Judging on a Collegial Court: Influences on Federal Appellate Decision Making"", Virginia Hettinger, Stefanie Lindquist, and Wendy Martinek examine the dynamic that gives rise to such dissensus in federal appeals courts, revealing how the appellate process shapes the content and the consistency of the law.

Produktinformation

Utgivningsdatum2007-07-31
Mått149 x 216 x 12 mm
Vikt270 g
FormatHäftad
SpråkEngelska
SerieConstitutionalism and Democracy
Antal sidor168
FörlagUniversity of Virginia Press
ISBN9780813926971

Tillhör följande kategorier

Rättsvetenskap inom Juridik
Rättsordning inom Juridik

Using sophisticated state-of-the-art statistical techniques, the authors present convincing and often surprising answers to their research questions. Their work helps to illuminate judicial voting and judicial opinion behavior on the appeals courts and as such contributes to our understanding of appeals court decision-making. The book will surely be considered a classic in the field. - Sheldon Goldman, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, author of Picking Federal Judges: Lower Court Selection from Roosevelt through Reagan ""This is an excellent and ambitious work that is theoretically driven and empirically grounded. The authors offer a persuasive and compelling account of the internal dynamics of the U.S. Courts of Appeals.... It is challenging to offer a unified circuit court model. But the authors do that and much more. The resulting work is meticulously researched and well-written. It will be a definitive work on the courts."" - Tracey E. George, Vanderbilt University ""[Judging on a Collegial Court] is theoretically rich and methodologically sophisticated."" - Law and Politics Book Review