This is very readable and avoids the jargon which litters CLS writing. It thus makes the topic very accessible. The issues are well developed and practical. It engages with the work of other authors students will have studied. JS Bell, University of Leeds. Ian Ward's Introduction to Critical Legal Theory provides an introductory explanation, which is at the same time chronological and thematic, of the development of critical thinking in law, with each step shown to be a critical response to the previous one. The central concern is with the efforts made to build on and then move beyond 'modernity' in legal thought: the basis in rationality and the pursuit of truth and justice. The book moves in seven chapters from 'Identifying Modernism', with an exploration of classical Greek thought about truth and the law and an overview of subsequent natural law theories, through Kantian and neo-Kantian critique of modernity, to theories of communitarianism (eg Unger, Nussbaum, Arendt and Habermas) and positivism (eg Hobbes, Locke, Hume, Bentham and Mill to Twining and Tamanaha), economic theories and law (eg from Locke and Smith to Marx, Hayek and Posner) to Foucault and the Critical Legal Studies movement and finally, in Chapter 7, 'Postmodernism and Deconstruction.'The whole book is presented clearly and readably with a self-conscious effort made to engage the student reader. Part of this strategy involves the entertaining technique of introducing many of the legal thinkers by way of their idiosyncrasies. We learn, for example, of the classical Greeks' interest in sex and feasting, Hobbes's belief in the benefits of sweating, Bentham's dislike of lawyers but belief in the merits of gardening and Marx's 'bottomless anger,' but penchant for 'ritualistic picnics' on Hampstead Heath. These delightful insights help draw the reader along Ward's fascinating path through centuries of critical legal thinking. Where the study really takes off, though, is in Chapter 7. Here there is an unmistakable sense of Professor Ward's own enthusiasm for his particular interests. The discussion of Nietzsche, Camus, law and literature (especially Weisberg) and the turn to deconstructionism (from Lyotard to Derrida and Douzinas) is undertaken with verve and insightful clarity. The chapter - and the book - end with a somewhat (by contrast) lacklustre commentary on what are important issues, namely Rorty's pragmatism and the Fish-Fiss dialogue, a discussion of which more could have been made and which seems almost anticlimactic, despite its significance. Finally, Introduction to Critical Legal Theory, like A Critical Introduction to Law, eschews footnotes but provides a substantial bibliography for further reading. Both are worthy additions to the Cavendish stable and are highly recommended. Cambrian Law Review, 2005. Dr Stephen Skinner. Lecturer in Law, Department of Law, University of Wales, Aberystwyth.
