Beställningsvara. Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar. Fri frakt för medlemmar vid köp för minst 249 kr.
This prescient book examines the evolving hybrid nature of social work within modern welfare states. Expert authors discuss how human service providers engage with a variety of other providers and logics, such as medical, psychological, educational and law.Drawing on case studies from Australia, Europe, and North America, chapters analyze the changing responsibilities of social workers, exploring their involvement in policy practice, epistemic communities, and interprofessional collaboration. Contributing authors demonstrate how practitioners navigate the challenges of medicalization, juridification, managerialism and shifting expectations. They highlight the key potential of interdisciplinary approaches to overcome entrenched fragmentations in the human service sector. Ultimately, the book argues that while hybrid social work is often sought after in Western welfare systems, it involves considerable complexity for professionals.Presenting insightful perspectives on the interaction between social work practice and broader welfare state developments, this book is an indispensable resource for students and scholars in social work, social policy, political science, and the sociology of professions and organizations. It will also benefit political advisors and policymakers across the social welfare sector.
Edited by Ivan Harsløf, Associate Professor, Simon Innvær, Associate Professor, Dag Jenssen, Associate Professor, Wenche Bekken, Associate Professor, Department of Social Work, Child Welfare, and Social Policy, Oslo Metropolitan University, Norway and Ingo Bode, Professor of Social Policy, Organisation and Society, Faculty of Human Sciences, Institute of Social Work and Social Welfare, University of Kassel, Germany
ContentsPreface xii1 Evolving hybrid worlds of social work 1Ingo Bode, Simon Innvær, Dag Jenssen, Wenche Bekken andIvan HarsløfPART I Contested knowledge – epistemological foundations ofhybrid social work2 The epistemic culture of hybrid social work: insights fromorganisational settings in Germany and Norway 21Dag Jenssen, Ingo Bode and Robin Lenz3 Awakening our epistemic consciousness: Re-thinkinginterprofessional health social work 46Hannah Cootes4 The importance of ‘system knowledge’ among Norwegiansocial workers in host settings 67Ivan HarsløfPART II Medicalization and hybrid interventions5 ‘Not prioritized, but very important’: social work captured inmedical and psychological reasoning 85Wenche Bekken6 Social nursing in Denmark: a specialized response tovulnerability in healthcare 104Anette Lykke Hindhede, Ingrid Poulsen and Jonas Debesay7 In the absence of social workers at Danish somatic hospitals:the social dimension in the social nurse function 119Karin Højbjerg, Emilie Marie Andrés, Christian IldrupGadgaard, Carsten Juul Jensen and Heidi Lene Myglegaard Andersen8 The libra of institutional logics: Theorizing hybrid structuresin human service organizations in the field of disability 136Jens Ineland and Faten NoufPART III Interprofessional collaboration9 Three logics of acculturation on social workers’ perceptionsof their interprofessional teamwork 158Simon Innvær and Henriette Lund Skyberg10 ‘You should do what you’re good at’: boundary work ininterprofessional teams 174Sylvie van Dam and Peter RaeymaeckersPART IV The interface with other organizations11 Complementary roles or multiple idiosyncrasy?: Patchworkcollaboration in local action against homelessness in Germany 192Ingo Bode and Moritz Bachmann12 Between transaction and hybridization: French human serviceprofessionals dealing with multiple logics of action 209Philippe Lyet13 Value conflicts: how US social workers manage the ethics ofoutsider practice 224Corey S. Shdaimah, Lauren P. McCarthy, Rachel Imbodenand Patrice Forrester14 Conclusion to Hybrid Social Work 242Ivan Harsløf, Simon Innvær, Dag Jenssen, Wenche Bekkenand Ingo Bode
‘Using high quality, original research, esteemed scholars from Europe, the US and Australia discuss the complex interdependencies of human service provision through a hybrid social work lens. The chapters portray an eloquent dance between the tensions and opportunities of collaboration and of maintaining professional boundaries. They highlight that social workers under hybrid governance may both contribute to disguising power and hierarchies, and that social workers in such settings may play significant roles as mediators of trust. The book raises important questions about the role of social workers within interprofessional networks in evolving hybrid landscapes.’