Marie Delaplace (marie.delaplace@u-pem.fr) holds a PhD (1994) and a “habilitation à diriger les recherches” (2009) in economics on the emergence of different types of innovations (IT, biopolymers, transportation, services) in different places. Since 2011, she has been professor of planning and regional development in the Lab’Urba research unit at the “École d’urbanisme de Paris” (Paris School of Urban Planning) within Université Paris-Est Marne-la-Vallée (UPEM). Her works have focused on the wide-ranging effects of high-speed rail on local economic development for more than 15 years and on tourism and local economic development for more than 10 years. She is the co-director of the “City, Tourism, Transport and Territories” Group within the Urban Futures LabEx and represents the university president in the French association AsTRES (Association for Tourism Research and Higher Education). In 2017, she co-founded the Observatory for Research on Mega-Events (ORME) at Université Paris-Est (https://www.u-orme.fr/en/). Alone or with other researchers, she has published almost 60 articles in academic journals and 10 book chapters on these issues. Pierre-Olaf Schut (po.schut@u-pem.fr) is a Professor of sports history in the research center “Analyse Comparée des Pouvoirs” (EA 3350) at Université Paris-Est Marne-la-Vallée, France. His main research areas are the development of sports and their relationships with tourism and regional planning, especially regarding sports facilities. He also works on the history of Olympism and the legacy of mega-events. He has co-founded ORME, the Observatory for Research on Mega-Events. He is part of the editorial board of the International Journal of the History of Sport and elected in the International Society for the History of Physical Education and Sport council. He recently published in French Espaces et lieux de sport dans l’histoire by EPURE.

• List of illustrations. List of contributors. Foreword: building the Olympic legacy for Paris 2024. Acknowledgements.Introduction: Lessons from the past to understand the future of the Games.Part I: Some debates concerning hosting Olympic Games1. Why do cities withdraw from hosting the Olympic Games? 2. The battle for public opinion in host cities: The paradox of the Olympics as a troubled brand. 3. The International Olympic Committee’s struggle against growing gigantism of the Olympic Games.Part II: Olympic Games as a tool for urban and territorial development?4. The territorial and urban dimensions of the Summer Olympics: A review of publications (1984–2018). 5. Bidding for the Olympic Games: A gearing effect? 6. The role of heritagization in managing uncertainties linked to major events and mega urban projects: Comparing the Olympic Games in London (2012) and Athens (2004). 7. The relationship between Olympic Games and tourism: Why such heterogeneity?: Towards a place-based approach.Part III: Risk, uncertainty and environmental issues8. Integrating public behaviours into operational responses to crisis situations: A way to improve security of major events? 9. The microbiological quality of the Seine River: Is it compatible with open water Olympic competitions? 10. Paris 2024 Olympic/Para-Olympic Games and air quality. Conclusion: Towards Olympic public–private partnerships. Index.

Select Guide Rating

Marie Delaplace (marie.delaplace@u-pem.fr) holds a PhD (1994) and a “habilitation à diriger les recherches” (2009) in economics on the emergence of different types of innovations (IT, biopolymers, transportation, services) in different places. Since 2011, she has been professor of planning and regional development in the Lab’Urba research unit at the “École d’urbanisme de Paris” (Paris School of Urban Planning) within Université Paris-Est Marne-la-Vallée (UPEM). Her works have focused on the wide-ranging effects of high-speed rail on local economic development for more than 15 years and on tourism and local economic development for more than 10 years. She is the co-director of the “City, Tourism, Transport and Territories” Group within the Urban Futures LabEx and represents the university president in the French association AsTRES (Association for Tourism Research and Higher Education). In 2017, she co-founded the Observatory for Research on Mega-Events (ORME) at Université Paris-Est (https://www.u-orme.fr/en/). Alone or with other researchers, she has published almost 60 articles in academic journals and 10 book chapters on these issues. Pierre-Olaf Schut (po.schut@u-pem.fr) is a Professor of sports history in the research center “Analyse Comparée des Pouvoirs” (EA 3350) at Université Paris-Est Marne-la-Vallée, France. His main research areas are the development of sports and their relationships with tourism and regional planning, especially regarding sports facilities. He also works on the history of Olympism and the legacy of mega-events. He has co-founded ORME, the Observatory for Research on Mega-Events. He is part of the editorial board of the International Journal of the History of Sport and elected in the International Society for the History of Physical Education and Sport council. He recently published in French Espaces et lieux de sport dans l’histoire by EPURE.

• List of illustrations. List of contributors. Foreword: building the Olympic legacy for Paris 2024. Acknowledgements.Introduction: Lessons from the past to understand the future of the Games.Part I: Some debates concerning hosting Olympic Games1. Why do cities withdraw from hosting the Olympic Games? 2. The battle for public opinion in host cities: The paradox of the Olympics as a troubled brand. 3. The International Olympic Committee’s struggle against growing gigantism of the Olympic Games.Part II: Olympic Games as a tool for urban and territorial development?4. The territorial and urban dimensions of the Summer Olympics: A review of publications (1984–2018). 5. Bidding for the Olympic Games: A gearing effect? 6. The role of heritagization in managing uncertainties linked to major events and mega urban projects: Comparing the Olympic Games in London (2012) and Athens (2004). 7. The relationship between Olympic Games and tourism: Why such heterogeneity?: Towards a place-based approach.Part III: Risk, uncertainty and environmental issues8. Integrating public behaviours into operational responses to crisis situations: A way to improve security of major events? 9. The microbiological quality of the Seine River: Is it compatible with open water Olympic competitions? 10. Paris 2024 Olympic/Para-Olympic Games and air quality. Conclusion: Towards Olympic public–private partnerships. Index.

Select Guide Rating

Marie Delaplace (marie.delaplace@u-pem.fr) holds a PhD (1994) and a “habilitation à diriger les recherches” (2009) in economics on the emergence of different types of innovations (IT, biopolymers, transportation, services) in different places. Since 2011, she has been professor of planning and regional development in the Lab’Urba research unit at the “École d’urbanisme de Paris” (Paris School of Urban Planning) within Université Paris-Est Marne-la-Vallée (UPEM). Her works have focused on the wide-ranging effects of high-speed rail on local economic development for more than 15 years and on tourism and local economic development for more than 10 years. She is the co-director of the “City, Tourism, Transport and Territories” Group within the Urban Futures LabEx and represents the university president in the French association AsTRES (Association for Tourism Research and Higher Education). In 2017, she co-founded the Observatory for Research on Mega-Events (ORME) at Université Paris-Est (https://www.u-orme.fr/en/). Alone or with other researchers, she has published almost 60 articles in academic journals and 10 book chapters on these issues. Pierre-Olaf Schut (po.schut@u-pem.fr) is a Professor of sports history in the research center “Analyse Comparée des Pouvoirs” (EA 3350) at Université Paris-Est Marne-la-Vallée, France. His main research areas are the development of sports and their relationships with tourism and regional planning, especially regarding sports facilities. He also works on the history of Olympism and the legacy of mega-events. He has co-founded ORME, the Observatory for Research on Mega-Events. He is part of the editorial board of the International Journal of the History of Sport and elected in the International Society for the History of Physical Education and Sport council. He recently published in French Espaces et lieux de sport dans l’histoire by EPURE.

• List of illustrations. List of contributors. Foreword: building the Olympic legacy for Paris 2024. Acknowledgements.Introduction: Lessons from the past to understand the future of the Games.Part I: Some debates concerning hosting Olympic Games1. Why do cities withdraw from hosting the Olympic Games? 2. The battle for public opinion in host cities: The paradox of the Olympics as a troubled brand. 3. The International Olympic Committee’s struggle against growing gigantism of the Olympic Games.Part II: Olympic Games as a tool for urban and territorial development?4. The territorial and urban dimensions of the Summer Olympics: A review of publications (1984–2018). 5. Bidding for the Olympic Games: A gearing effect? 6. The role of heritagization in managing uncertainties linked to major events and mega urban projects: Comparing the Olympic Games in London (2012) and Athens (2004). 7. The relationship between Olympic Games and tourism: Why such heterogeneity?: Towards a place-based approach.Part III: Risk, uncertainty and environmental issues8. Integrating public behaviours into operational responses to crisis situations: A way to improve security of major events? 9. The microbiological quality of the Seine River: Is it compatible with open water Olympic competitions? 10. Paris 2024 Olympic/Para-Olympic Games and air quality. Conclusion: Towards Olympic public–private partnerships. Index.

Select Guide Rating