"Stephen Theron has […] read Hegel's philosophy as the most exemplary form of Christian theology. In Hegel's Theology: Revelation Thematised, he recommends that Hegel should be read beginning with what Aristotle had called 'first philosophy', where 'being is thought, thinking' (p. vii), 'as the Idea of being' (p. viii). He contends that philosophy must subsume 'without destroying, both religion and art' (p. viii). And he recommends an allegorical reading of Hegel 'in a form suited to our age, of a Patristic commentary on Scripture' (p. ix), in which 'Hegel's notion of spirit is thus equivalent to the Pauline view of the absolute, of God, as "all in all"' (p. x).[…] Hegel's Theology contains a lengthy prologue followed by twenty-one short essays divided thematically into the sections titled (A) Historical, (B) Theological, and (C) Philosophical. It opens with the prologue where Theron frames Hegel as a Christian theologian before proceeding to address the topics of traditional dogmatics from the Trinity to biblical exegesis. […] Stephen Theron's theological essays and commentaries have brilliantly illustrated how Hegel can be read as a theologian, and his Logic can be read as a preparation for his theology. Hegel has, admittedly, often been read to have irreversibly departed from pre-Kantian metaphysics, scholastic logic, and the canonical doctrines of Christian theology, even as he can also be read to have critically recapitulated all of these categories for new philosophical purposes. Religion can, following Ludwig Andreas Feuerbach, thus be sublated in and for secular philosophy. Yet as Theron's intervention suggests, the role of religion in Hegel may have always been considerably more ambiguous. He recommends an allegorical reading of scripture alongside Hegel's Logic. And he thus tends to endorse a circuitous reading of Hegel, in which, as with Origen and Augustine, the spiritual meaning of religious revelation may have always been determinative of its dialectical movements."Ryan HaeckerPeterhouse, University of Cambridge; Reviews in Religion and Theology, Vol. 26, Issue 5, December 2019