"As an introduction to the thought and work of Hayden White, it is hard to see this volume being surpassed for some considerable time."Reviews in History "A thoughtful, comprehensive and much needed introduction to the work of White. It is not only well argued and researched, but also readable and accessible. It should be required reading not only for undergraduate and postgraduate students, but all historians who want to understand how the discipline of history changed over the twentieth century."International Network for Theory of History "Paul has accessibly, lucidly and systematically analysed the development of White’s thought in such a way as to challenge the common understanding of White as a poststructuralist and postmodernist. He has, in short, produced a fine introduction."European Review of History"Warmly recommended to every historian as a reliable roadmap into the highly relevant quest of this philosopher."Leidschrift "Should be applauded for bringing to bear a much-needed philosophical perspective on Hayden White’s influential and extensive oeuvre."Philosophy of the Social Sciences "This study is unlikely to be surpassed in the near future in its scholarly attention to detail."H-Soz-u-Kult "A useful, and in many ways exemplary, introduction to White’s legacy."History and Theory "A sharp book on an American intellectual whose work was not that of an outsider throwing rocks at a profession. This essay-review applauds Paul's endeavor."Rethinking History "The most balanced introduction to White’s philosophy of history available."Torbjörn Gustafsson Chorell, Uppsala University "This book both attests to the importance of Hayden White as a metahistorian and provides a lucid account of his life and thought. It is a well-deserved tribute to the work and the man - a reliable introduction and an invitation to join in the critical dialogue his thought encourages."Dominick LaCapra, Cornell University"In this deeply researched and probing analysis of Hayden White, Herman Paul offers a strikingly novel interpretation of the goals and significance of his theories of historical writing. In contrast to virtually all previous commentators, Paul argues that the core of White's work is not principally concerned with rhetoric and narratology as such but seeks, instead, to offer a form of 'liberation historiography' that can free historians of the 'burden of history,' a concern stemming from White's lifelong embrace of existentialist humanism. Narratology, in Paul's view, achieved prominence in White's thinking because it offered a way to contest positivist history and thus unburden historians of their espousal of naïve realism and fantasies of objectivity."Gabrielle M. Spiegel, Johns Hopkins University
