Federica Casarosa, Research Affiliate at Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, and part-time Professor at the European University Institute, Florence.Mohor Fajdiga, Teaching Assistant and PhD candidate at the Faculty of Law, University of Ljubljana.Madalina Moraru, Associate Professor of EU Law, Department of Political Science, University of Bologna, and part-time Associate Professor at the European University Institute, Florence.

• Part I: Judicial free speech standards emerging from the European courts jurisprudence and other horizontal issues; 1. Should Judicial Voices be Heard? Judicial interactions between national and European courts reframing freedom of expression as a tool to protect the European rule of law; 2. The freedom of expression of judges in Europe: an analysis of the case law under Article 10 of the European Convention of Human Rights. The rule of law in the leading role; 3. ‘Chilling Effect’ of Limiting Freedom of Expression of Judges: Connecting the Dots from Legal and Extra-legal Doctrine; 4. What standards should be applied to judges exercising freedom of expression on social networks? Part II: Lessons for Europe: national perspectives on freedom of expression of judges; 5. All quiet in the judiciary: low voice of Hungarian judges and the role of European courts; 6. Speech is silver. Is silence golden? 7. Judges' presence on social media in times of constitutional breakdown in Poland; 8. Working as a judge or being a judge: on the specific features of freedom of expression of the judiciary in Italy; Part III : Epilogue; 9. (Personal) reflections on (legal) developments concerning freedom of expression of judges