Francis Bacon and the Refiguring of Early Modern Thought

Julie Robin Solomon is the Scholar in Residence at the Department of Literature, American University, Washington DC, USA. Catherine Gimelli Martin is the Professor of English at the University of Memphis, USA.

• Contents: Introduction, Julie Robin Solomon; Bacon, atomism, and imposture: the true and the useful in history, myth and theory, Reid Barbour; The new science and the via negativa: a mystical source for Baconian empiricism, Michael McCanles; The feminine birth of the mind: regendering the empirical subject in Bacon and his followers, Catherine Gimelli Martin; 'The very idea!': Francis Bacon and E.O. Wilson on the rehabilitation of Eidos, John C. Briggs; Francis Bacon and the unity of knowledge: reason and revelation, Jerry Weinberger; The hidden life of matter: techniques for prolonging of life in the writings of Francis Bacon, Guido Giglioni; 'The purer foundations': Bacon and legal education, Daniel R. Coquillette; A society of Baconians?: the collective development of Bacon's method in the Royal Society of London, William T. Lynch; Francis Bacon, The Advancement of Learning and historical thought, Fritz Levy; 'Seated between the old world and the new': geopolitics, natural philosophy and proficient method, Timothy J. Reiss; Select bibliography; Index.

'A useful addition to the ongoing debate on Bacon and his importance to both the early modern and the modern world...' Renaissance Quarterly 'The editors have done well in putting together an interesting and wide-ranging collection that advances our understanding of Bacon's large and complex project for joining together all intellectual disciplines.' Isis ’...a valuable addition to both Bacon scholarship and to early modern studies in general...this collection of essays has value that it offers potential for new avenues of research...this work will undoubtedly be of interest to scholars from a wide range of disciplines, a remarkable feat for a work whose essays can trace their origins to a single claim by a modern sociobiologist.’ Sixteenth Century Journal