Kristen Rundle is a Lecturer in Law at the London School of Economics.

• 1 Reclaiming Fuller I Form and Agency II What is Being 'Reclaimed'? III About the Book: Method, Material and StructureIV Outline of the Chapters 2 Before the Debate I The Early Fuller: Positivism and Natural Law at Mid-century II Eunomics: A 'Science or Theory of Good Order and Workable Social Arrangements' III Navigating the Labels IV Conclusion 3 The 1958 Debate I Mapping the Debate II Reclaiming Fuller through the Nazi Law Debate III Fuller and Legal Validity IV Conclusion4 The Morality of Law I Mapping The Morality of Law II Hart's Review of The Morality of Law III A Different Path? IV Conclusion 5 The Reply to Critics I Mapping the 'Reply to Critics' II Generality, Efficacy and Agency: Insights from the Archive III Reflections on the 'Reply to Critics' IV Conclusion 6 Resituating Fuller I: Raz I Fuller and Raz II Raz on the Rule of Law III Raz on Authority IV Conclusion: Form, Agency and Authority 7 Resituating Fuller II: Dworkin I Fuller and Dworkin II The 1965 Essays III Dworkin's Project IV Fuller, Dworkin and Interpretation V Fuller, Dworkin and Methodology VI Fuller, Dworkin and the Value of Legality VII Conclusion: Taking Form Seriously 8 Three Conversations I Morality II Instrumentalism III Legality Fuller and Shapiro: A New Conversation? IV Conclusion

There is much of interest in this book for any legal philosopher. It is good to see the various elements of Fuller's work brought together as a larger interconnected project; and the interweaving of published and unpublished materials is a useful aid to deeper appreciation and understanding.