'This is a wonderfully iconoclastic book which will disturb both admirers and critics of social science research. Experiments in Knowing offers a lucid critique of quantitative and experimental methods, and a powerful argument for continuing to use and respect them. It convinced me of the possibilities of a more humane and gender-encompassing social science.' Alice Kessler-Harris, Professor of History, Columbia University 'Ann Oakley continues to teach me more than any other researcher with whom I have worked closely. The example she sets in this challenging new book should be a rallying point for all those researchers who purport to be interested in assessing how to minimize harm and maximize benefit in health care, social care and education.' Iain Chalmers, Director, The UK Cochrane Centre 'Buying this book will permit the reader to retire a dozen or more books from the shelf. It claims to be about the history and sociology of ways of knowing and is alarmingly informative on each account. Moreover, it is about how to think well about difficult topics, including the role of controlled experiments in assessing contemporary social interventions. This book is not for those who value rhetoric over realism. It is excellent reading.' Dr Robert Boruch, University of Pennsylvania 'It is not possible to do justice here to Experiments in Knowing; this book is a tour de force, big in every sense. It is long, dense and intensely argued, and it covers an impressive scope from fourteenth-century scholarship to present day debates ... I want to emphasize the comprehensive nature of the book and the validity of the problems and questions that Oakley raises. Her ideas deserve and need to be debated by all of us who do seek to contribute to social improvement - in whatever form this takes.' Social Policy '[I have] a much enriched understanding of the gendering of ways of knowing brought about by this book. Let us thank Ann Oakley for her urging us to move on to purposefully 'disclose relations not otherwise apparent', by continuing with systematic enquiry while ending androcentrism.' British Journal of Sociology
