Michal Bobek is Advocate General at the Court of Justice of the European Union. Jeremias Adams-Prassl is Professor of Law at Magdalen College, Oxford, and Deputy Director of the Institute of European and Comparative Law, University of Oxford.

• Introduction Jeremias Adams-Prassl and Michal BobekPART ITHE FOUNDATIONS1. The Role of the EU Charter in the Member States Koen Lenaerts2. The EU Charter Ten Years On: A View from Strasbourg Siofra O’LearyPART IIMEMBER STATE PERSPECTIVES3. Austria: United in Consistent Interpretation Christoph Grabenwarter and Christine Pesendorfer4. Belgium: The EU Charter in a Tradition of Openness Sarah Lambrecht5. Bulgaria: Rays of Light in a Cloudy Sky 9Alexander Kornezov6. Czech Republic and Slovakia: Another International Human Rights Treaty? Adam Blisa, Pavel Molek and Katarina Šipulova7. The EU Charter before the French Parliament and Courts: Between (Great) Disillusion and (Little) Hope Laurence Burgorgue-Larsen8. Taking Up the European Mandate: The Charter Before German Courts Mattias Wendel9. Hungary: A Half-Hearted Look at the Charter Antal Berkes, Andras Jakab and Pal Sonnevend10. Ireland and the Charter: Ten Underwhelming Years? Gerard Hogan11. Italy: New Frontiers and Further Developments Silvana Sciarra and Angelo Jr Golia12. The Netherlands: The New Kid on the Block, Growing Pains or Growing Gains? Corinna Wissels and Aniel Pahladsingh13. Poland – The Charter of Fundamental Rights as a Last Resort? Krystyna Kowalik-Banczyk14. Portugal: Lukewarm Engagement with the Charter Goncalo de Almeida Ribeiro and Patricia Fragoso Martins15. Trials, Tributes and Tribulations: The EU Charter before the Slovenian Courts Matej Accetto16. The (Incomplete) Reception of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights in Spain Daniel Sarmiento and Xavier Codina17. Limited But Not Inconsequential: The Application of the Charter by the Courts of England and Wales Lady Arden and Takis TridimasPART IIISELECTED RIGHTS18. Article 8: The Right to Data Protection Orla Lynskey19. Article 47: The Right to an Effective Remedy and to a Fair Trial Kathleen Gutman20. Article 50: The Elusive Shape of the Ne Bis In Idem Rule Magdalena Lickova21. Article 51: The Scope of Application of the Charter Sara Iglesias Sanchez22. Article 52: Twenty-Eight Shades of Interpretation? Maja Brkan and Šejla Imamovic23. Why Article 53 of the Charter Should Ground the Application of National Fundamental Rights in Fully Harmonised Areas Francois-Xavier MilletPART IVBROADER PERSPECTIVES24. References for a Preliminary Ruling and the Charter of Fundamental Rights: Experiences and Data from 2010 to 2018 David Reichel and Gabriel N. Toggenburg25. The Charter as a Standard of Constitutional Review in the Member States Clara Rauchegger26. Exporting Cherries for the Cakes: The Charter of Fundamental Rightsin Domestic Courts of the EU’s Neighbourhood Adam Lazowski27. Protecting Fundamental Rights Beyond the Charter: Repositioning the Reverse Solange Doctrine in Light of the CJEU’s Article 2 TEU Case-Law Armin von Bogdandy and Luke Dimitrios Spieker28. The Cosmopolitan and Federal Margins of Appreciation Alexander SomekConclusion Michal Bobek and Jeremias Adams-Prassl

This outstanding work should be of great interest for national and European scholars, practitioners, and judges willing to better understand the circulation of the Charter in Europe as a whole.