Dose of Emptiness

Jose Ignacio Cabezon is Assistant Professor of the Philosophy of Religion at the Iliff School of Theology in Denver. He is the editor of Buddhism, Sexuality, and Gender also published by SUNY Press.

• AcknowledgmentsIntroductionA Short Biography of mKhas grub rjeTranslation: THE GREAT DIGEST[Preamble][Hommage][Reason for the Composition of the Text][The Buddha's Doctrine as the Ultimate Source of Salvation][The Prophecies of Nagarjuna's Coming][Introduction]1. The Reason Why It Is Correct to Seek Out Reality [The Emptiness Taught in the Tantras]2. The Benefits of Trusting in the Profound [Doctrine of Emptiness]3. The Vessel, That is, the Listen, to Whom This Doctrine Should be Explained[A Misconception Concerning Emptiness and Its Consequences][The Characteristics of the Proper Disciple]4. The Actual Doctrine to Be Explained4.1 Identifying Which Scriptures Are of Definitive Meaning (nges don) and Which of Provisional Meaning (drang don)4.1.1 THE DOCTRINES OF THE YOGACARA SCHOOL[Yogacara Metaphysics and Hermeneutics][The Three Natures]The Reality of the Dependent and the Real, and the Yogacara Critique of the Madhyamaka][The Rationale Behind the Prajnaparamita's Claims That Things "Do Not Arise" According to the Sutralamkara, a Yogacara Text][The Elucidation of Some Scriptural Passages Highlighting Unique Features of the Yogacara][The Yogacara Belief in Three Final Vehicles and a Foundation Consciousness (kun gzhi) as Another of Their Distinctive Features][Arguments Against the Advocates of "the Emptiness of What Is Other" (gzhan stong)][The Distinctively Yogacara Use of the Example of the Illusion and the Status of the Dependent][Tsong kha pa's Unique Exposition of the Yogacara Theory of Emptiness][On Latent Potentialities][The Proof of the Linguistic Interpretation of Emptiness][Nonduality as a Corollary of the Linguistic Interpretation of Emptiness][The Explanation of the Three Natures][Similarity in Terminology Between the Yogacara and Prasangika Is Not a Reflection of an Underlying Similarity in Meaning][Cittamatra Hermeneutics]THE DOCTRINES OF THE MADHYAMAKA SCHOOL[The Sources of the Madhyamaka School]4.2.1. How the Father, the Arya Nagarjuna, and His Son [Aryadeva], Following Such Sutras as the Aksayamatinirdesa, Set Forth the Doctrine of the Definitive and the Provisional4.2 How, Step by Step, the Texts of Nagarjuna and the Commentaries on Their Purport (dgongs pa) Arose4.2.1. The Explanation of the Way in Which the Scriptures of the Arya Were Written4.2.2. The Explanation of How the Individual Commentaries on the Purport [of Nagarjuna's Treatises] Arose[A General Introduction to the Madhyamaka][On the Classification of Madhyamikas][The Meaning of the Claim That Prasangikas Accord with the World]4.2.3. Setting Forth Emptiness by Following Those [Madhyamaka Scriptures]4.2.3.1. Identifying Which Analyzes the Ultimate (don dam dpyod pa'i rtags)4.2.3.1.1. Why It Is Necessary to Identify What Is to Be Refuted4.2.3.1.2. Refuting the Scriptural Exegesis of Those Who [Proceed in the] Refutation without Identifying [the Object to Be Refuted]4.2.3.1.2.1. Refuting the One Who Overextends (khyab ches ba) Himself or Herself in the Identification of What Is to Be Refuted4.2.3.1.2.1.1. Stating What They Believe4.2.3.1.2.1.2. Refuting Them4.2.3.1.2.1.2.1. Demonstrating That They Have Refuted the Principle and Special Quality of the Prasangika Madhyamikas4.2.3.1.2.1.2.1.1. Identifying That Chief Quality4.2.3.1.2.1.2.1.2. How They Have Refuted That [Special Quality] by Their System [of Interpretation]4.2.3.1.2.1.2.2. Deomonstrating Those Reason to Be Faulty4.2.3.1.2.1.2.2.1. Demonstrating That Their Examination of What It Means for Something to "Withstand or Not Withstand Logical Analysis" Is Faulty4.2.3.1.2.1.2.2.2. Demonstrating That Their Analysis into the Four Possibilities, Existence, Nonexistence, and So Forth, Is Faulty [The Law of Excluded Middle and the Question of Whether the Madhyamaka Has a Viewpoint][A Critique of Quietism]4.2.3.1.2.1.2.2.3. Demonstrating That Their Analysis of [What It Means for Something] to Be Established or Not Established by a Valid Cognition, and Their Subsequent Refutation, Is Faulty4.2.3.1.2.1.2.2.4. Demonstrating That [Their] Examination of Whether Arising Can Be Determined to Exist in Any One of the Four Ways, Such as Arising from Self, Is Faulty4.2.3.1.2.1.2.2.5. Demonstrating That It Is Incorrect to Urge on Us the Absurdity That What We Advocate Goes Against the Four Reliances4.2.3.1.2.2. How We Refute the One Who Does Not Go Far Enough (khyab cung ba) in the indentification of the Object of Refutation4.2.3.1.3. The Explanation of What Our Own System [Considers] to Be the Extent of What Is to Be Refuted4.2.3.1.3.1. Explaining in a General Way the Layout of What Is to Be Refuted[Innate and Philosophical Misconceptions][THE DOCTRINES OF THE SVATANTRIKA SCHOOL][The Logic of the Svatantrika Critique]4.2.3.1.3.2. The Explanation of the Measure of the Svatantrikas' Object of Refutation[The Analysis of the Svatantrikas' Object of Refutation Based on the Example of the Illusion][The Analysis of the Svatantrikas' Object of Refutation Based on Scriptural Sources][The Correct Identification of the Svatantrikas' Object of Refutation][The Reasoning of the One and the Many][How the Example of the Reflection in the Mirror Is Understood][The Diamond-Granule Reasoning and the Question of the Qualification of the Object of Refutation][The Reasoning Refuting Arising via the Four Extremes][The Reasoning Refuting the Arising of the Existent and Nonexistent][THE DOCTRINES OF THE PRASANGIKA SCHOOL][A General Expositiong of Prasangika Tenets]4.2.3.1.3.3. Explaining the Extent (tshad) of the Prasangikas' Object of Refutation (dgag bya)[Does Reality Truly Exist or Is It Too a Mere Label?][An Excursus on the Essence Body of the Buddha][The Argument Concerning Reality Continues][The Reasoning Used to Prove That One Phenomenon Is Empty Applies to All Phenomena, Including Emptiness][As It Does Not Truly Exist, Emptiness Is Only a Mental Label][The Meaning of "According with the World" in the Prasangika System][The Scriptural Basis for Nominalism][True Existence, the Opposite of Nominal Existence]4.2.3.1.3.4. Refuting Misconceptions in Regard to the [Distinction between Svatantrikas and Prasangikas][On "Withstanding Logical Analysis"]4.2.3.1.3.5. An Explanation of the Implications of This4.2.3.1.3.5.1. An Explanation of (1) the Two Kinds of Selflessness to Be Refuted and (2) the Selflessness That Is the Refutation4.2.3.1.3.5.1.1. A Brief Mention of the Tenets Advocated by Other Systems4.2.3.1.3.5.1.1.1. Identifying the Self that Is the Perceived Object (dmigs yul) of the Innate View of a Self As Accepted by Both Buddhists and Others4.2.3.1.3.5.1.1.2. What Faults the Glorious Candra Finds in These [Views]4.2.3.1.3.5.1.1.3. How the Other Buddhist Schools Posit the Self That Is the Direct Object of the Two Views of the Self [the Person and Phenomena] and How That Self, Which Is Something to Be Refited, Is Posited as Nonexistent[The Hinayana's Views on Liberation and Buddhahood]4.2.3.1.3.5.1.1.4. How the Glorious Candra's Critique Is to Be Expounded4.2.3.1.3.5.1.2. The Exposition of the System of the Prasangikas as a Distinct [System in Its Own Right][A Brief Explanation of the Differences between the Selflessness of the Differences between the Selflessness of the Person and Phenomena][Sravakas and Pratyekabuddhas Understand Reality]4.2.3.1.3.5.2. The Explanation of Whether Sravakas and Pratyekabuddhas

"It is encyclopedic and covers the most important ideas in the whole fabric of Indian Mahayana-Tibetan Buddhism. It brings to sharp relief of the many debates, controversies, and variant interpretations of the key issues. Some of the elucidations are only found in these Tibetan sources and thus increases the value of this work."— Kenneth Inada, State Univeersity of New York at Buffalo