Design For Values

JEROEN VAN DEN HOVEN is University Professor at Delft University of Technology. He is Founding Editor in Chief of Ethics and Information Technology, Scientific Director of the Delft Digital Ethics Centre, permanent member of the European Group on Ethics, co-chair of the WHO Expert Group on Ethics and Governance of AI in Health, and permanent member of the European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies. IBO VAN DE POEL is Professor in Ethics and Technology at TU Delft. A member of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW), he is a principal investigator of the gravitation project Ethics of Socially Disruptive Technologies and has published widely on responsible innovation and design for values. PIETER VERMAAS is Professor of philosophy of quantum technologies at TU Delft, where he leads ethics research for the Dutch national programme QDNL. His current research concerns the moral, societal, and political impact of quantum computing, quantum internet, and quantum sensing.

• Contributor List viiAcknowledgement viii1 Technology and Values 11.1 Introduction 11.2 Our Designs Are Value-Laden 21.3 Design for Values 31.4 Ethics in the 21st Century 71.5 Overview of the Book 82 Ethics and Design 102.1 Values in Design 102.2 From Applied Ethics to Ethics by Design 142.3 Features of the Design-for-Value Approach 182.4 Conclusions 203 Design 223.1 Introduction: What Is Design? 223.2 Analyzing Design Tasks 273.3 Developing Responses 293.4 Evaluating Responses 314 Values 334.1 Introduction: What Are Values? 334.2 Value Pluralism and Moral Overload 394.3 Putting Values in Context 425 Design for Values: Analyzing Tasks 505.1 Analyzing Design Tasks 505.2 Understanding and Framing Design Tasks 596 Design for Values: Developing Responses 716.1 Detailing: Specification of Values 716.2 Multiple Response Directions: Overcoming Moral Overload 756.3 Task and Response Coevolution 767 Design for Values: Evaluating Responses 857.1 Prototyping and Value Testing 857.2 Validation 917.3 Monitoring and Value Change 938 A Case 1008.1 The Design Task 1008.2 Investigations: Empathy and Stakeholders 1018.3 Developing Multiple Responses 1018.4 Task and Response Coevolution 1048.5 Moral Overload 1048.6 Evaluating Responses 1059 Values Are Design Consequential 1079.1 The Design Consequentiality of Values 1079.2 Enabling and Developing Design for Values 11210 Criticisms, Responses, and Insights 12210.1 Existing Design Is Already Design for Values 12210.2 Values Cannot Be Embedded in Design but Depend on Use 12310.3 Values Are Relative to Place and Culture 12510.4 Values Are Fundamentally Contested 12610.5 Design for Values Can Also Be Used for Bad Purposes 12810.6 Values are not Static Entities but Might Change 12910.7 Design for Values Is a Technological Fix 130Some Final Thoughts 133Bibliography 136